2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2004.01.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guided waves in a plate with linearly varying thickness: experimental and numerical results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been shown that such structural details do not fundamentally affect the propagation of FFGW and that models based on simplified plate (2D) or tube (3D) geometry provide good predictions on FFGW in real bone (Moilanen et al, 2007b;Moilanen et al, 2007c). Tapering of layers or of the entire bilayer system is, on the other hand, known to alter the mode map (Ech-Cherif El-Kettani et al, 2004). In this case, modes other than FFGW are mainly affected.…”
Section: G Limitations Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that such structural details do not fundamentally affect the propagation of FFGW and that models based on simplified plate (2D) or tube (3D) geometry provide good predictions on FFGW in real bone (Moilanen et al, 2007b;Moilanen et al, 2007c). Tapering of layers or of the entire bilayer system is, on the other hand, known to alter the mode map (Ech-Cherif El-Kettani et al, 2004). In this case, modes other than FFGW are mainly affected.…”
Section: G Limitations Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usual approach in this case is to consider the lowest modes of a Lamb wave, including symmetric and anti-symmetric modes in a plate whose thickness varies slowly with distance so that at any point, the Lamb wave analysis for constant thickness can be applied (these propagating waves in a slowly varying cross-sectional area are adiabatic waves where the wave continuously adapts to the change in local thickness through a modification of the wavenumber and phase velocity) 18 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) is acceptable for the computation of its group delay. [11][12][13] Obviously, this requires that the GW considered in each segment for the computation of the group delay is generated by the incoming wave that has been considered in the previous segment of waveguide.…”
Section: Group Delay Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%