2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1474-919x.2002.00091.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guidelines for assigning species rank

Abstract: Developments in several fields of study (including bio‐acoustics and the analysis of DNA) together with reappraisals of the nature of species have impacted significantly on avian taxonomy. The BOU's Taxonomic Subcommittee has developed guidelines for the application of species limits to sympatric, parapatric, allopatric and hybridizing taxa. These are published here to assist researchers understand the rationale behind the committee's taxonomic recommendations relating to the British List.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
235
0
8

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 241 publications
(260 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
6
235
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The debates suffer from use of one word, 'species', to describe different concepts that are then discussed at cross purposes. For an entrée to the large literature on species concepts in birds see Helbig et al (2002), Remsen (2005), Watson (2005), Garnett and Christidis (2007) and de Queiroz (2007, especially fig. 1).…”
Section: Phylogeography's Impact On Taxonomy: a Hint Of Future Debatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The debates suffer from use of one word, 'species', to describe different concepts that are then discussed at cross purposes. For an entrée to the large literature on species concepts in birds see Helbig et al (2002), Remsen (2005), Watson (2005), Garnett and Christidis (2007) and de Queiroz (2007, especially fig. 1).…”
Section: Phylogeography's Impact On Taxonomy: a Hint Of Future Debatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is increasing recognition of the importance of multiple criteria including plumage, morphometrics, song, mtDNA, nDNA, interbreeding, and others, when determining species limits (e.g. de Queiroz 1998de Queiroz , 2007Helbig et al 2002;Sites and Marshall 2004).…”
Section: Paraphyly and Biological Insights: Complexity In The Presentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ecological segregation is usually accompanied by appreciable morphological, vocal, genetic and/or behavioural differentiation. If two closely related sympatric taxa were to maintain such differences over long periods of time, this would be taken as extremely strong evidence for separate species status (Helbig et al 2002). While nothing is known of the voice of the Liberian Greenbul, in terms of general morphology, biometrics and plumage coloration it is almost identical to the Icterine Greenbul, except for the distinctive white spots to the greater coverts and remiges of P. leucolepis, which are absent in P. icterinus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Biological Species Concept cannot easily be applied to allopatric populations because biological species are defined by reproductive isolation, which cannot be directly observed except for populations that coexist in space and time (cf. Mayr & Ashlock 1991;Helbig et al 2002). Under the Phylogenetic Species Concept, species are population lineages that are diagnosably different (Cracraft 1983); the related General Lineage Concept (de Queiroz 1999;Helbig et al 2002) requires that such lineages, to be considered species, must be expected to retain their integrity in future should populations come back into contact.…”
Section: Taxonomic Treatment and Species Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%