2017
DOI: 10.20343/5.1.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guidelines for Authorship Credit, Order, and Co-Inquirer Learning in Collaborative Faculty-Student SoTL Projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It will address the four major shortcomings of Maurer's (2013) investigation by including a second, delayed BSDS posttest, additional measures of self and peer attitudes towards the target groups (Gervais, 2011Pew Research Center 2014, 2017Wojcieszak, 2011Wojcieszak, , 2012, an additional experimental condition in which participants view their peers' attitudes on the BSDS but do not participate in the BSDS activity, and two target groups (i.e., homosexuals and atheists).…”
Section: Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It will address the four major shortcomings of Maurer's (2013) investigation by including a second, delayed BSDS posttest, additional measures of self and peer attitudes towards the target groups (Gervais, 2011Pew Research Center 2014, 2017Wojcieszak, 2011Wojcieszak, , 2012, an additional experimental condition in which participants view their peers' attitudes on the BSDS but do not participate in the BSDS activity, and two target groups (i.e., homosexuals and atheists).…”
Section: Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partnering with students, particularly undergraduate students, is becoming an increasingly common and increasingly researched practice in SoTL (e.g., Werder & Otis, 2010). Additionally, Maurer (2017) has called for SoTL scholars to pay explicit attention to undergraduate students' learning from the research process itself when students participate in SoTL projects as co-inquirers, "broadening the definition of 'learning' under investigation to include student collaborators' own learning from the process." (p. 5).…”
Section: Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%