Guidelines for automated implementation of executable object oriented models for real-time embedded control systems

Saksena, M.; Freedman, Paul L.; Rodziewicz, P.

doi:10.1109/real.1997.641286

Cited by 39 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Constraints between ports could be expressed as standard UML constraints or as stereotyped associations between ports. We may notice that the concepts of constrained ports and their associated message chains have some similarity to the transactions proposed in [7]. The information DASE associates with hardware nodes and communication links is much richer than the information mentioned in published examples of UML specifications, but in UML these modeling elements are actually stereotypes of classes or objects and of associations.…”

Section: Beyond Casementioning

confidence: 87%

“…Further, sequence diagrams may not be the most appropriate means to specify them, as they can only represent scenarios, that are specific instances of interactions. It has been proposed [7] that timing constraints should be expressed in terms of transactions, i.e., end-to-end computations that can be extracted (or abstracted) from sequence diagrams.…”

Section: Real-time Requirements and Umlmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Dase Tool: An Environment for the Development of Real-Time Applications

Natale

Domenici

1999

Distributed and Parallel Embedded Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Beyond Casementioning

confidence: 87%

Section: Real-time Requirements and Umlmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Dase Tool: An Environment for the Development of Real-Time Applications

Natale

Domenici

1999

Distributed and Parallel Embedded Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For example, Figure 13 (adapted from [28]) shows transactions with temporal constraints, between the speed controller and other system components.…”

Section: ) Dependabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

A Decision Support Framework for the Choice of Languages and Methods for the Design of Real Time Embedded Systems

Monthe¹,

Nana²,

Kouamou³

et al. 2016

JSEA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The choice of methods or design languages is a crucial phase in the development of systems and software, also for real time and embedded systems. An open question that remains in the design of these types of systems is to build a method, or to choose one among those existing, capable to cover the life cycle of a project, and particularly the development phases. This article contributes to answer the question, by proposing an approach based on a multi-criteria comparative study, of few languages and methods dedicated to the design of real time and embedded systems. The underlying objective of this work is to present to designers a wide range of approaches, and elements that can guide their choices. In order to reach this goal, we propose different comparison criteria. Each criterion is divided into sub-criteria, so that the designers can refine their choices according to the qualities they prefer and wish to have in the method or language. We also define a rating scale which is used to assess the retained languages and methods. The scores obtained from this assessment are presented in tables, one table per criterion, followed by a summary table giving the overall scores. Graphics built from these tables are provided and intend to facilitate the judgement and thus the choice of the designers.

show abstract

“…This is a scheduling problem. The order of execution of the concurrent components within a task is determined either at compile-time (as is typically done in synchronous languages) or at run-time (e.g., ROOM [29]). A second level of scheduling is required when there are more than one tasks.…”

Section: A the Elements Of The Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%