2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2015.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
2,158
0
203

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,064 publications
(2,366 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
2,158
0
203
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, we produce a systematic mapping study (SMS) summarizing publications falling under the scope of our study without considering their quality [26,34]. This SMS can be beneficial for several types of readers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this work, we produce a systematic mapping study (SMS) summarizing publications falling under the scope of our study without considering their quality [26,34]. This SMS can be beneficial for several types of readers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As per available SMS guidelines [26,34], we focus our investigation on a set of particular research questions. Broadly speaking, we are interested in mapping the space of GORE research, providing a structure and visual summary of the field as per [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SMS is originally established in medical research and has been adapted into software engineering field with some adjustments and extensions (Kitchenham and Charters, 2007;Petersen et al, 2008). A systematic mapping study is applicable as a research method to investigate the current achievement in the respective area and useful in identifying regions that demand more studies to be conducted (Kitchenham and Charters, 2007).…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systematic mapping study is a proper method to reveal whether there is research evidence on a topic, and to provide any indication of the quantity of evidence (Kitchenham & Charters, 2007). The guidelines provided by Petersen et al (2008);Petersen, Vakkalanka, and Kuzniarz (2015); and Kitchenham, Budgen, and Brereton (2011) were applied. Existing criteria on research approaches given by Wieringa, Maiden, and Roland (2006) were utilised in the evaluation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%