2014
DOI: 10.1182/asheducation-2014.1.210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guidelines for quantifying iron overload

Abstract: Both primary and secondary iron overload are increasingly prevalent in the United States because of immigration from the Far East, increasing transfusion therapy in sickle cell disease, and improved survivorship of hematologic malignancies. This chapter describes the use of historical data, serological measures, and MRI to estimate somatic iron burden. Before chelation therapy, transfusional volume is an accurate method for estimating liver iron burden, whereas transferrin saturation reflects the risk of extra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
88
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
88
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…2,3 Nonetheless, because a single measurement only reflects the labile iron species present during the previous 24-48 hours, repeated measurements are imperative to assess a potential risk of impending NTBI toxicity. 18 The majority of the assays in the current round robin have given useful insights into the efficacy of iron chelation in transfusional siderotic patients and of phlebotomy in patients with HH. 2,3,9,13,[19][20][21][22][37][38][39][40] Despite this finding, in the absence of studies that assess the independent relation of assay levels to clinical outcome in these various categories of patients, the clinically most relevant assay formats and their decision limits remain unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2,3 Nonetheless, because a single measurement only reflects the labile iron species present during the previous 24-48 hours, repeated measurements are imperative to assess a potential risk of impending NTBI toxicity. 18 The majority of the assays in the current round robin have given useful insights into the efficacy of iron chelation in transfusional siderotic patients and of phlebotomy in patients with HH. 2,3,9,13,[19][20][21][22][37][38][39][40] Despite this finding, in the absence of studies that assess the independent relation of assay levels to clinical outcome in these various categories of patients, the clinically most relevant assay formats and their decision limits remain unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is well known that as an acute phase reactant, serum ferritin levels are influenced by factors such as inflammation and liver disease and are not, therefore, exclusively indicative of toxic parenchymal iron overload. 17 Moreover, with the introduction of T2*-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of tissue iron overload, 18 it became clear that organs such as the heart and endocrine glands load iron differently compared to the liver and non-commensurately with serum ferritin. Studies of plasma NTBI in patients with thalassemia major suggest that NTBI may be an important early indicator of extra-hepatic iron toxicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This population appears to be prone to the greatest degree of discrepancy in all validation studies. Assessment of patients falling into the category of severe iron overload is important because whilst cardiac and liver iron concentrations are often discordant, LIC>15mg/g have been found to correlate with increased risk of cardiac disease and premature death [15]. However, whilst it is crucial to identify those patients with high LIC in order to implement aggressive chelation therapy, accurate assessment of LIC is more relevant in patients with lower LIC to facilitate chelation dose modifications and thus avoid excessive exposure and unnecessary toxicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, to interpret TSAT measurements, patients should withhold iron chelation for at least 1 day before measurement, as the presence of iron chelation in the bloodstream may influence the results 3. Notably, patients with LIC ≥ 7 mg/g, despite low ferritin levels, did have very high TSAT levels suggesting that TSAT may be helpful in recognizing patients with iron overload despite a low ferritin.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%