Guidelines for Sexual Health Care for Prostate Cancer Patients: Recommendations of an International Panel

Abstract

Background Patients with prostate cancer suffer significant sexual dysfunction after treatment which negatively affects them and their partners psychologically, and strain their relationships. Aim We convened an international panel with the aim of developing guidelines that will inform clinicians, patients and partners about the impact of prostate cancer therapies (PCT) on patients’ and partners’ sexual health, their relationships, and about biopsychosocial rehabilitation in prostate cancer (PC) survivorship. Methods The guidelines panel included international expert researchers and clinicians, and a guideline methodologist. A systematic review of the literature, using the Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, PsychINFO, LGBT Life, and Embase databases was conducted (1995–2022) according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Study selection was based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Each statement was assigned an evidence strength (A-C) and a recommendation level (strong, moderate, conditional) based on benefit/risk assessment. Data synthesis included meta-analyses of studies deemed of sufficient quality (3), using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR). Outcomes Guidelines for sexual health care for patients with prostate cancer were developed, based on available evidence and the expertise of the international panel. Results The guidelines account for patients’ cultural, ethnic, and racial diversity. They attend to the unique needs of individuals with diverse sexual orientations and gender identities. The guidelines are based on literature review, a theoretical model of sexual recovery after PCT, and 6 principles that promote clinician-initiated discussion of realistic expectations of sexual outcomes and mitigation of sexual side-effects through biopsychosocial rehabilitation. Forty-seven statements address the psychosexual, relationship, and functional domains in addition to statements on lifestyle modification, assessment, provider education, and systemic challenges to providing sexual health care in PC survivorship. Clinical Implications The guidelines provide clinicians with a comprehensive approach to sexual health care for patients with prostate cancer. Strengths & Limitations The strength of the study is the comprehensive evaluation of existing evidence on sexual dysfunction and rehabilitation in prostate cancer that can, along with available expert knowledge, best undergird clinical practice. Limitation is the variation in the evidence supporting interventions and the lack of research on issues facing patients with prostate cancer in low and middle-income countries. Conclusion The guidelines document the distressing sexual sequelae of PCT, provide evidence-based recommendations for sexual rehabilitation and outline areas for future research.

Sexual health problems of patients with cancer: A bibliometrics study and visualization analysis via CiteSpace

“…Cancer and its treatment often result in gonadotoxic and normal pelvic floor tissue damage among patients with breast, rectal, and genitourinary neoplasms [ 54 ], and studies show that the incidence of sexual dysfunction in those patients with ranges from 30 % to 80 % [ [55] , [56] , [57] , [58] ]. Given this situation, the publication of sexual health care guidelines for patients with these types of cancer can better help patients solve sexual health problems [ 59 ]. Currently, patients with breast, rectal, and genitourinary neoplasms are a target group in sexual health research, and health professionals need to use appropriate methods and tools to accurately assess the risk and frequency of sexual health issues in this group of people [ 60 , 61 ].…”

Evaluation of sexual function after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy: A farewell toIIEFquestionnaire

“…As a result, only one‐fifth of men who have been diagnosed with PCa, and presumably fewer cases in Japan, ever discuss issues related to sexual dysfunction with their physicians 11 . Recently, the International Society of Sexual Medicine published a guideline regarding sexual health care for PCa patients, 12 which stated that there are large differences depending on national origin and ethnicity. In other words, it is impossible to unify sexual care with one guideline, and it is necessary to fit the situation of each country.…”

Loneliness, spiritual well-being, and death perception, as well as their risk factors in urological cancer patients

“…Benefitting from the advancement of treatment strategies, the prognosis of urological cancer patients has been improved to some extent ( 3 - 5 ). Unfortunately, urological cancers and the corresponding treatments unavoidably affect patients' physical and psychological status ( 6 - 8 ). Urological cancer patients usually suffer from negative emotions, such as loneliness, unstable spirituality, and fear of death, which might ultimately influence their quality of life, treatment outcome, and even survival ( 9 - 11 ).…”