2015
DOI: 10.1145/2764916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guiding Novice Web Workers in Making Image Descriptions Using Templates

Abstract: This article compares two methods of employing novice Web workers to author descriptions of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics images to make them accessible to individuals with visual and print-reading disabilities. The goal is to identify methods of creating image descriptions that are inexpensive, effective, and follow established accessibility guidelines. The first method explicitly presented the guidelines to the worker, then the worker constructed the image description in an empty text box… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
22
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…While these approaches are well-intentioned, in aiming to address the engineering problem of how to automatically generate natural language captions for charts, they have largely sidestepped the complementary (and prior) question: which semantic content should be generated to begin with? Some captions may be more or less descriptive than others, and different readers may receive different semantic content as more or less useful, depending on their levels of data literacy, domain-expertise, and/or visual perceptual ability [69,71,72]. To help orient work on automatic visualization captioning, our four-level model of semantic content offers a means of asking and answering these more human-centric questions.…”
Section: Computer Vision and Natural Language Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these approaches are well-intentioned, in aiming to address the engineering problem of how to automatically generate natural language captions for charts, they have largely sidestepped the complementary (and prior) question: which semantic content should be generated to begin with? Some captions may be more or less descriptive than others, and different readers may receive different semantic content as more or less useful, depending on their levels of data literacy, domain-expertise, and/or visual perceptual ability [69,71,72]. To help orient work on automatic visualization captioning, our four-level model of semantic content offers a means of asking and answering these more human-centric questions.…”
Section: Computer Vision and Natural Language Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We intend to use document figure classification as a first step in automatic educational image summarization applications. A similar idea is followed by Morash et al [10], who built one template for each type of image, then manually classified images and filled out the templates, and suggested automating the steps of that process. Moraes et al [11] mentioned the same idea for their SIGHT (Summarizing Information GrapHics Textually) system.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such close-ended approaches might potentially even go so far as to provide a fixed checklist instead of a free-text box. Alternatively, templates could be created that, for example, identify what types of content to insert when constructing a sentence [77,107]. Such approaches "prime" workers towards certain work outcomes by giving them examples.…”
Section: Considering the Trade-offs Of Open-ended Captioning Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%