2006
DOI: 10.1175/jpo2963.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gulf Stream Variability in Five Oceanic General Circulation Models

Abstract: Five non-eddy-resolving oceanic general circulation models driven by atmospheric fluxes derived from the NCEP reanalysis are used to investigate the link between the Gulf Stream (GS) variability, the atmospheric circulation, and the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC). Despite the limited model resolution, the temperature at the 200-m depth along the mean GS axis behaves similarly in most models to that observed, and it is also well correlated with the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), indicatin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

15
45
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
15
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They are moreover closely linked with the simulated variability of the AMOC strength. Although a similar connection has been observed for shorter simulations (about 50 years; De Coëtlogon et al 2006), it is the first time this is illustrated at longer time scales, and, in particular, in a lastmillennium transient simulation. This result supports inferences of the AMOC variability through reconstructions of the FC intensity with paleo-estimations of the density field.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They are moreover closely linked with the simulated variability of the AMOC strength. Although a similar connection has been observed for shorter simulations (about 50 years; De Coëtlogon et al 2006), it is the first time this is illustrated at longer time scales, and, in particular, in a lastmillennium transient simulation. This result supports inferences of the AMOC variability through reconstructions of the FC intensity with paleo-estimations of the density field.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…If at all, this would be an argument to render unreliable the reconstructed variability. Earlier modeling studies on the variability of the FC and the AMOC with higher resolution models, albeit for different climate scenarios, supported the idea of covariability between the FC and the AMOC (e.g., Johns et al 2002;De Coëtlogon et al 2006;Lynch-Stieglitz et al 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Häkkinen andRhines (2004, 2009) found that the subpolar gyre has slowed down during the 1990s when deep water formation declined. As discussed in Kwon et al (2010), the weakening of the subpolar gyre was reproduced in an eddy-permitting hindcast, and it was highly correlated with a weakening of the AMOC and a northward shift of the Gulf Stream, consistent with earlier simulations (de Coëtlogon et al 2006). On the other hand, Zhang (2008) suggested, based on the GFDL CM2.1 control integration, that the observed decrease in subpolar gyre intensity was correlated with a strengthening of the AMOC and a southward shift of the Gulf Stream due to the increased deep western boundary current (see Zhang and Vallis 2006).…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
“…The other hindcasts similarly show that the intensification of the MOC occurs broadly in phase with that of the subpolar gyre (e.g., Eden and Willebrand 2001, de Coëtlogon et al 2006. Hence, the present simulation seems broadly representative of OGCM simulations, and a key to the differences with the coupled models is the different lead-lag relation between gyre strength and MOC.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%