2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10353-011-0590-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Gut access in critically ill and injured patients: Where have we gone thus far?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13 Naso-enteric tube feeds have higher complications (irritations, ulceration, bleeding, dislocation, and clogging), and PEG/PEJ feeding has reduced rates of esophageal reflux and aspiration pneumonia. 14,15 Increasing numbers of patients are now discharged to their home or community care on continued EN via tube feeds. [11][12][13][14] Nutrition support has shown to improve the outcomes in critically ill patients who are at high risk of malnutrition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Naso-enteric tube feeds have higher complications (irritations, ulceration, bleeding, dislocation, and clogging), and PEG/PEJ feeding has reduced rates of esophageal reflux and aspiration pneumonia. 14,15 Increasing numbers of patients are now discharged to their home or community care on continued EN via tube feeds. [11][12][13][14] Nutrition support has shown to improve the outcomes in critically ill patients who are at high risk of malnutrition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More commonly though, in the majority of industrialised countries, in their hospitals, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the technique of choice [6]. Other techniques such as laparoscopically assisted or complete laparoscopic gastrostomy and jejunostomy are certainly possible and practised around the world.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 In critically ill patients and in patients who need long-term nutritional support, enteral (rather than parenteral) feeding is still currently preferred; it is recognized as the standard of care. 6,7 The reported complication rate of PEG tube placement has varied among the various patient populations studied and according to the definitions used; the range has been 3% to 26%. 4,8Y13 PEG-related mortality is very unusual.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%