2016
DOI: 10.1586/17469899.2016.1164597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

GWAS in myopia: insights into disease and implications for the clinic

Abstract: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 IntroductionMyopia is already the commonest eye condition and its prevalence is increasing across the world (1-4). Although myopia is strongly associated with a number of environmental factors, the most important risk factor in determining whether an individual develops the trait is havi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, debate surrounding the relevance of animal models to human myopia has primarily focused on similarities and differences in visual experience, refractive development and anatomy (for review see refs 4 , 64 68 ). Our findings contribute to an additional small but growing body of evidence for molecular similarities between humans and animal models 21 , 65 , 69 73 , made possible by the recent availability of large-scale refractive error GWAS 74 . The two induction time-points in our meta-analysis were roughly proportionally represented in the overlap with human GWAS candidate genes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…To date, debate surrounding the relevance of animal models to human myopia has primarily focused on similarities and differences in visual experience, refractive development and anatomy (for review see refs 4 , 64 68 ). Our findings contribute to an additional small but growing body of evidence for molecular similarities between humans and animal models 21 , 65 , 69 73 , made possible by the recent availability of large-scale refractive error GWAS 74 . The two induction time-points in our meta-analysis were roughly proportionally represented in the overlap with human GWAS candidate genes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…They oppose the action of kinases and phosphorylases and are involved in signal transduction, but have never been previously reported as changing in myopic tissues. In a previous study, PPP2R2 has been reported to be involved in the MAPK signaling pathway [ 98 ], and this pathway has a close relationship with myopia based on a clinical gene analysis [ 99 ] and a basic animal study [ 100 ]. Hence, our SWATH-based proteomic approach may yield more comprehensive proteins, including novel candidates, to the established pathways in myopia research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the recent rise in myopia prevalence would seem to be much faster than accountable by genetic mutations, it has taken the application of recent advances in molecular biology in the form of Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS), to overturn the traditional wisdom that myopia was largely genetic, based on observed trends within families and twin studies. Genetic variations are now thought to account for less than 12% of variations in refractive error, based on recent meta-analyses of GWAS investigations (7,8), suggesting environmental factors are at play.…”
Section: Environmental Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%