H.264 error resilience performance for wireless video conversational services

Analysis of Video Coding and Error Resilience Tools of H. 264/AVC in Wireless Environment

“…In these test conditions experiments shows that the graeter number of slices gives better quality as compared to FMO [ 9]. These experiments also shows that the packet length also decide the packet loss probability [9].…”

“…These experiments also shows that the packet length also decide the packet loss probability [9]. The smaller packet has less probability of loss.…”

“…After inverse quantization process the inverse transform and inverse entropy processes are applied for reconstruct the approximated image. with above given experiment conditions the performance of differnent error resilience schemes evaluated at different packet loss rates [9]. As shown in figure 4.1(a) and 4.1(b) The experiment shows that at higer packet loss rates FMO checkerboard give better-quality as compared to other FMO patterns.…”

“…From experiments [9] we observe that for Bridge sequence FMO checker board give the acceptable quality up to 40% loss rate. The performance of error resilience schemes in brust errors for wireless enviorments also evaluated [9]. The experiments perform with same test conditions as explain above except frame rate was 10 Hz.…”

“…FMO2, FMO3, FMO4, FMO5 is set for experimentation. [9] The encoder is set for output of RTP (Rapid Transport Protocol) packet file format with CBR (constant bit rate). Bit rate is 128Kbps having initial quantization parameter 28 for 1 st I frame.…”