“…The δ 34 S values of sulphides from the Shabaosi gold deposit are slightly lower than the published δ 34 S values for most orogenic gold deposits elsewhere (typically δ 34 S = 0-9‰, Groves et al, 1998;Kerrich et al, 2000;Goldfarb et al, 2001), but are generally similar to some of the sediment-hosted orogenic gold deposits (Chang et al, 2008), such as from À0.13‰ to 7.3‰ in Amantaytau gold deposit in Uzbekistan (Pasava et al, 2013), À5.0‰ to 2.3‰ in Macraes gold deposit in New Zealand (Craw et al, 1995), À6.3‰ to 2.6‰ in Natalka gold deposit in Russia (Eremin et al, 1994), À1.4‰ to 9.3‰ in the Bendigo gold deposit in Australia (Bierlein et al, 2004) and À3.6‰ to 6.2‰ in the Awanda gold deposit in China (Ding et al, 2014 The gases of fluid inclusions from auriferous quartz sample were released by progressive crushing 25 547 times during steps 1-33. The δ 34 S values of sulphides from the Shabaosi gold deposit are slightly lower than the published δ 34 S values for most orogenic gold deposits elsewhere (typically δ 34 S = 0-9‰, Groves et al, 1998;Kerrich et al, 2000;Goldfarb et al, 2001), but are generally similar to some of the sediment-hosted orogenic gold deposits (Chang et al, 2008), such as from À0.13‰ to 7.3‰ in Amantaytau gold deposit in Uzbekistan (Pasava et al, 2013), À5.0‰ to 2.3‰ in Macraes gold deposit in New Zealand (Craw et al, 1995), À6.3‰ to 2.6‰ in Natalka gold deposit in Russia (Eremin et al, 1994), À1.4‰ to 9.3‰ in the Bendigo gold deposit in Australia (Bierlein et al, 2004) and À3.6‰ to 6.2‰ in the Awanda gold deposit in China (Ding et al, 2014 The gases of fluid inclusions from auriferous quartz sample were released by progressive crushing 25 547 times during steps 1-33.…”