2011
DOI: 10.3182/20110828-6-it-1002.02548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

H∞ State Feedback Control of Discrete-time Markov Jump Linear Systems through Linear Matrix Inequalities*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
17
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…(17), as detailed in [17]. The next corollary, already reported in [18], compares our results with that of Theorem 3.4 from [27]. Proof.…”
Section: Uncertain Probabilitiessupporting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(17), as detailed in [17]. The next corollary, already reported in [18], compares our results with that of Theorem 3.4 from [27]. Proof.…”
Section: Uncertain Probabilitiessupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Proof. The proof follows the same pattern already shown in [18] by showing that for g40 given, the feasibility of LMIs of Theorem 3.4 from [27] implies the feasibility of LMIs (8) and (9) at the vertices of the polytope (17). Since those sets of LMIs are affine with respect to the transition probabilities, the minimum g is an upper bound for the closed loop H 1 norm.…”
Section: Uncertain Probabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In contrast, little work has been done with incomplete mode information of the system regardless of its significance in practical MJLSs. Concerning partial or local mode information, two representative methods have been developed in the literature, i.e., local observations of the system operation modes [13], [14] and cluster observations of the system operation modes [5], [8], [9]. In the first one, the system is firstly decomposed into a set of interconnected lower dimensional subsystems, and local decentralized controllers are then designed based only on the state and mode information locally available within the subsystems; while in the second one, the complete Markov modes are firstly split into several non-overlapping clusters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike some existing controllers proposed in [13], [14], we not only use full state information and local mode information, but also take the knowledge of group modes of the reformulated system into consideration. Different from [5], [8], [9], we allow overlapping operation modes to be existed in the formed groups. Moreover, the jumps among different groups are governed by the high-level Markov chain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, similar analysis tools can be used. Some examples are the recent survey paper [156] and other references such as [142,148,149,162,164,168]. Because of the formality and completeness of the analysis, the paper [135] and the book [134] of the same authors deserve special attention.…”
Section: Stability Of Switched Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%