2010
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-80342010000100015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Habilidades de letramento após intervenção fonoaudiológica em crianças do 1º ano do ensino fundamental

Abstract: OBJETIVO: Verificar a eficácia de um Programa Fonoaudiológico de Estimulação do Letramento - PFEL, em crianças do 1° ano do Ensino Fundamental, em relação à efetividade deste nas habilidades de letramento, consciência fonológica, vocabulário e leitura. MÉTODOS: Trinta e sete crianças, de ambos os gêneros, com média de idade de sete anos e um mês, cursando o 1º ano do Ensino Fundamental realizaram avaliação, pré e após intervenção fonoaudiológica, do letramento, consciência fonológica, vocabulário e nível de le… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
7

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
6
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Less common, however, not less relevant, are investigations addressed to the spelling errors, characterized not only by the type of errors but especially by the way it progresses during the process of writing (8)(9)(10) . Finally, there are studies addressed to the efficacy of speech language programs on the performance of students (11) . Besides the aforementioned analyses, other investigations have focused on the relationship between speech and writing (12) ; between spelling and literacy (13) ; the matter of authorship in writing (14) ; and the questioning regarding the criteria that should consider the errors in children's writing as pathological (15) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Less common, however, not less relevant, are investigations addressed to the spelling errors, characterized not only by the type of errors but especially by the way it progresses during the process of writing (8)(9)(10) . Finally, there are studies addressed to the efficacy of speech language programs on the performance of students (11) . Besides the aforementioned analyses, other investigations have focused on the relationship between speech and writing (12) ; between spelling and literacy (13) ; the matter of authorship in writing (14) ; and the questioning regarding the criteria that should consider the errors in children's writing as pathological (15) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For students of the group GII, the ability of discriminate auditory stimuli and of processing auditory information is more compromised due to the frame of phonological disorder, however, when worked the sound discrimination in the early stages of literacy, the difficulty in distinguish and store information for hereafter use them in reading tasks, for example, becomes more effective because the phonological working memory is able to retain and manipulate information temporarily while participating in cognitive tasks such as reasoning, comprehension and learning 25,26 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This indicates a better performance average for students in the GI group, possibly due to the intervention done. In contrast, the maintenance of performance averages for students in the GII group suggests a difficulty in processing visual stimuli, which may be due to a change in the visual processing of the information, which is a difficulty found in children with dyslexia, which could justify the performance of this group 6,10,[21][22][23] .…”
Section: Meanmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Thus, the type of stimulus offered during the intervention was efficient to increase the mean of performance in specific activities of phonological awareness related to learning, but they were not sufficient to reach the performance of the students without risk for dyslexia 20,21 .…”
Section: Meanmentioning
confidence: 99%