“…Reflecting on the findings of this review, we provide five key recommendations for future research that would inform evidence‐based policy: - Ecological impact assessments: Trophy hunting can impose range of demographic effects ranging from positive to negative to deleterious; however, there is still a lack of demographic data for the impacts of harvesting on mammal populations in Asia. The limited existing data is mainly skewed towards non‐threatened species (Siberian ibex: Raza et al ., 2015; Khan et al ., 2019; Ahmad et al ., 2020; Blue sheep: Aryal et al ., 2015; Khattak et al ., 2020, Argali: Amgalanbaatar et al ., 2002; Harris & Pletscher, 2002; Himalayan tahr: Aryal et al ., 2015), while threatened ungulates like goitered gazelle, and West Caucasian tur, which are potentially prone to deleterious demographic impacts, are rarely studied.
- Socioeconomic impact assessments: Trophy hunting has multifaceted socioeconomic effects, yet only a few studies have focussed on this aspect of trophy hunting in Asia (Harris & Pletscher, 2002; Ali et al ., 2015; Aryal et al ., 2015; Nordbø et al ., 2017; Rashid et al ., 2020). Thus, further research is needed on the governance, revenue sharing, and benefits accrued to local communities.
…”