1992
DOI: 10.2307/3808856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Habitat Characteristics at Marten Subnivean Access Sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
1
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
30
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although conifer-dominated stands are believed to be preferred by marten, xeric-site conifers in particular, are not (Buskirk and Powell 1994). Xeric-site species such as jack pine produce less coarse woody debris (CWD) than do mesic-site species and CWD is considered an important habitat element for martens (Corn and Raphael 1992). The finding that Site Type 8 (black spruce-feathermoss-sphagnum) was not preferred by martens is also contrary to the NE-HSM.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…Although conifer-dominated stands are believed to be preferred by marten, xeric-site conifers in particular, are not (Buskirk and Powell 1994). Xeric-site species such as jack pine produce less coarse woody debris (CWD) than do mesic-site species and CWD is considered an important habitat element for martens (Corn and Raphael 1992). The finding that Site Type 8 (black spruce-feathermoss-sphagnum) was not preferred by martens is also contrary to the NE-HSM.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…; American marten, Martes americana; Corn and Raphael 1992); and necessary substrate, energy and nutrients for many invertebrates and fungi upon which many vertebrates forage (Bull and Jackson 1995;Bull et al 2001;Maser and Trappe 1984;Rhoades 1986). These broad uses can be further subdivided (e.g., Keisker 2000).…”
Section: Vertebratesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…comm. in Buskirk et al 1989;Corn and Raphael 1992;Hauptman 1979;Spencer 1987 Includes dens under root wads and trunks of fallen or leaning trees; cannot distinguish between logs and root wads. e A number of rest sites were classified as miscellaneous.…”
Section: Fungimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Key words:forest landscape, habitat, Greater Hing'an Mountains, Martes zibellina, driving force, timber harvest 在森林景观中, 采伐不仅改变动物生境的结构 特征, 如适宜生境斑块面积和数量减小、生境斑块 间的连通性减弱 (Chapin et al, 1998;Lindenmayer et al, 1999), 还改变林分类型、林龄结构等生境质量 特征, 进而影响其种群特征。例如美洲貂(Martes americana)偏爱30年以上林分面积比例大、采伐斑 块 边 界 密 度 低 的 落 叶 林 和 混 交 林 (Potvin et al, 2000), 许多鸟类偏爱成熟林 (Drapeau et al, 2000;Schieck & Song, 2006), 这些景观特征都会因采伐 而发生变化。另外, 采伐后形成的不同景观格局还 影响动物的移动格局(movement pattern) (Hayward et al, 1999) 选择要素入手 (Steventon & Major, 1982;Spencer et al, 1983;Hargis & Mccullough, 1984;Bateman, 1986;Buskirk et al, 1989;Corn & Raphael, 1992), 揭 示 了 美 洲 貂 对 采 伐 后 不 同 景 观 格 局 的 反 应 (Chapin et al, 1997(Chapin et al, , 1998Hargis et al, 1999;Potvin et al, 2000;Fuller et al, 2004;Bull et al, 2005;Fuller & Harrison, 2005;Porter et al, 2005), 并提出 相应的采伐建议。例如保留大面积成熟林斑块且保 持斑块间的连通性, 采伐面积不得超过30%, 且至 少保留50%的非采伐区域等 (Hargis et al, 1999;Potvin et al, 2000), 甚至通过人工造林塑造美洲貂的 适宜生境格局 (Sturtevant et al, 1996;Hargis et al, 1999 佟煜凡, 1981;马逸清和吴家炎, 1981;Monakhov, 1983;马文忠, 1985;Brzezinski, 1994;Safronov & Anikin, 2000;Dubinin & Valentsev, 2003;Miyoshi & Higashi, 2005), 还通过野外跟踪方法对紫貂生境要素选择 进行了系列研究 (刘福元, 1989;Buskirk et al, 1996;姜兆文, 1998;张洪海和马建章, 1999…”
unclassified