2019
DOI: 10.1111/ele.13450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Habitat fragmentation and species diversity in competitive communities

Abstract: Habitat loss is one of the key drivers of the ongoing decline of biodiversity. However, ecologists still argue about how fragmentation of habitat (independent of habitat loss) affects species richness. The recently proposed habitat amount hypothesis posits that species richness only depends on the total amount of habitat in a local landscape. In contrast, empirical studies report contrasting patterns: some find positive and others negative effects of fragmentation per se on species richness. To explain this ap… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
71
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(145 reference statements)
2
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Large areas of habitat tend to support more individuals, and hence, more species (Rosenzweig 1995). Increasing fragmentation may be detrimental if little habitat is available, but intermediate degrees of fragmentation may be beneficial for competitive communities when the amount of habitat is fairly high (Rybicki, Abrego, and Ovaskainen 2020). Besides modifying the spatial pattern of the landscape, habitat size reduction and increase of isolation cause an alteration of the dispersal rate, affecting survival, and mortality of individuals (Fahrig and Merriam 1994;Hanski 1994).…”
Section: Effects Of Landscape Change On Oristic Composition and Strucmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large areas of habitat tend to support more individuals, and hence, more species (Rosenzweig 1995). Increasing fragmentation may be detrimental if little habitat is available, but intermediate degrees of fragmentation may be beneficial for competitive communities when the amount of habitat is fairly high (Rybicki, Abrego, and Ovaskainen 2020). Besides modifying the spatial pattern of the landscape, habitat size reduction and increase of isolation cause an alteration of the dispersal rate, affecting survival, and mortality of individuals (Fahrig and Merriam 1994;Hanski 1994).…”
Section: Effects Of Landscape Change On Oristic Composition and Strucmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, the species-fragmented area relationship suggests that negative effects of FPS should reduce gamma-diversity compared to that predicted by the species-area relationship alone (Hanski et al, 2013). However, patch-scale studies and the modeling that describes the species-fragmented area relationship do not take into consideration mechanisms that can lead to positive effects of fragmentation, such as increased beta-diversity caused by competitive release and higher habitat diversity (Fahrig et al, 2019;Rybicki et al, 2019). These mechanisms may increase beta-diversity and thus lead to overall increases in gamma-diversity with FPS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical modeling is a useful way to address contested issues where field data are difficult to collect and are subject to confounding variables. To this end, simulation models have been used to study FPS, which represent individual organisms moving across simulated landscapes (Gunton et al, 2017;Rybicki et al, 2019;Thompson et al, 2019). However, these studies are conducted on binary landscapes with the space between the focal-habitat patches (the habitat type of interest), the matrix, being a single, usually highly unsuitable, habitat type.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reactants are any agents that disappear in a reaction, products are any agents that appear in a reaction, whereas catalysts are any agents that remain unchanged but they modify a rate of a reaction. RCP models apply to a broad class of situations, such as models of population ecology [ 5 , 6 , 25 ], metapopulation ecology [ 24 , 26 ], community ecology [ 23 , 27 , 28 ], pathogenesis [ 29 ], evolutionary ecology [ 6 , 30 , 31 ] and movement ecology [ 6 , 32 ].…”
Section: The Mathematical Framework Of Reactant–catalyst–product Modementioning
confidence: 99%