2018
DOI: 10.1093/jmammal/gyy139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Habitat structure influences refuge use by two sympatric species of Neotropical forest rodents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The environmental context surrounding potential refuges can also influence whether they will be used or not (Bhattacharyya, Dutta, Adhikari, & Rawat, 2015; McElhinny, Gibbons, Brack, & Bauhus, 2006; Reside et al, 2019). Many animals often select natural refuges close to important resources that provide protection, temperature regulation, or food (Bretscher, Dittel, Lambert, & Adler, 2018; Croak et al, 2012). Northern quolls in the Pilbara often inhabit complex rocky habitat, likely because it provides protection from predation (Cook, 2010; Hernandez‐Santin et al, 2016) and fire (Burrows, Ward, & Robinson, 2009), and often contains temporary ponds and sheltered crevices (Henneron, Sarthou, De Massary, & Ponge, 2019; Radford, Gibson, Corey, Carnes, & Fairman, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The environmental context surrounding potential refuges can also influence whether they will be used or not (Bhattacharyya, Dutta, Adhikari, & Rawat, 2015; McElhinny, Gibbons, Brack, & Bauhus, 2006; Reside et al, 2019). Many animals often select natural refuges close to important resources that provide protection, temperature regulation, or food (Bretscher, Dittel, Lambert, & Adler, 2018; Croak et al, 2012). Northern quolls in the Pilbara often inhabit complex rocky habitat, likely because it provides protection from predation (Cook, 2010; Hernandez‐Santin et al, 2016) and fire (Burrows, Ward, & Robinson, 2009), and often contains temporary ponds and sheltered crevices (Henneron, Sarthou, De Massary, & Ponge, 2019; Radford, Gibson, Corey, Carnes, & Fairman, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%