2004
DOI: 10.2193/0022-541x(2004)068[0509:huofsi]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Habitat Use of Fox Squirrels in Southwestern Georgia

Abstract: Fox squirrel (Sciurus niger) populations are declining in the southeastern United States, presumably as a function of habitat loss. Because the ecology of southeastern subspecies of fox squirrels differs greatly from their well-studied midwestern relatives, habitat studies of midwestern fox squirrels are of limited use for managing southeastern subspecies. Therefore, we initiated a radiotelemetry study to evaluate habitat use of fox squirrels (n = 101) in southwestern Georgia, USA. Our results indicated that s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Habitat types with distance ratios significantly <1 were selected, and those significantly >1 were avoided. Habitat types were ranked by performing pairwise mean comparisons using univariate t tests (Conner and Plowman 2001;Perkins and Conner 2004). We considered statistical significance for all analyses at P≤0.10.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Habitat types with distance ratios significantly <1 were selected, and those significantly >1 were avoided. Habitat types were ranked by performing pairwise mean comparisons using univariate t tests (Conner and Plowman 2001;Perkins and Conner 2004). We considered statistical significance for all analyses at P≤0.10.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EDA has become a commonly used method to determine coarse-scale wildlife habitat use patterns (Conner and Plowman 2001;Perkins and Conner 2004;Cox et al 2006). EDA has been described as being more robust to telemetry error than classification-based analyses, but further evaluation of the type 1 error distribution, and the effects of spatial scaling, especially at the landscape level, is needed (Conner et al 2003).…”
Section: Habitat Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking biological criteria into consideration, we defined six habitat types within the study area (Table 2) using both aerial photographs and ground surveys, and then each habitat patch was digitized using Arcview 3.2. Habitat types covariates for each trapping location were measured using a Euclidean distance-based approach (Perkins and Conner 2004;Benson and Chamberlain 2007). We calculated distances from camera traps to each habitat type by using X-Tools and Geoprocessing extensions in Arcview 3.2.…”
Section: Carnivore Occupancymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We preferred this method because two of our habitat types (food plots and road grades) were essentially linear features; this precluded the use of methods that require area-based estimates of habitat availability (e.g., compositional analysis; Aebischer et al 1993). The distancebased approach compares observed distances from radiolocations to a given habitat type with the expected distance to that habitat type in order to test the hypothesis that habitat types are used in proportion to their availabilities (Conner et al 2003(Conner et al , 2005Perkins and Conner 2004). When compared to classification-based methods, inferences based on the distance-based analysis are more robust with respect to habitat misclassifications (Bingham and Brennan 2004).…”
Section: Habitat Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%