2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10344-010-0405-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the occupancy of sympatric carnivorans in a Mediterranean ecosystem

Abstract: Site occupancy provides a reasonable estimate of population status and trends, and it also provides an unbiased, cost-effective alternative method for large-scale, multispecies monitoring programs. In this study, we used camera-trapping data to determine carnivoran occupancy and associated environmental factors in Serra da Malcata Nature Reserve, Portugal. The study was intended as a precursor of further long-term multispecies monitoring programs. We estimated carnivoran species occupancy using a likelihood-ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
17
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…They may provide a new and cost-effective technique for surveying terrestrial small mammals, particularly when presence data are the main requirement of the survey [54–55]. The use of camera traps to collect data on small mammals to assess prey availability for carnivores was already performed [56], but here we went a step further and included imperfect detection on prey estimates (through occupancy modeling, see “Single-species occupancy models” section) instead of using the number of captures. We considered small-sized mammals (< 1 kg; mainly small rodents and small marsupials) and small birds (< 0.2 g; mainly passerines and doves) as the main prey for margay and oncilla, and small and medium-sized mammals (< 13 kg; mainly small rodents, small marsupials, opossums, Brazilian rabbit, paca, armadillo, and porcupine) as well as small and medium-sized birds (< 0.5 g; passerines, doves, and tinamous) for ocelot [35, 57–61].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They may provide a new and cost-effective technique for surveying terrestrial small mammals, particularly when presence data are the main requirement of the survey [54–55]. The use of camera traps to collect data on small mammals to assess prey availability for carnivores was already performed [56], but here we went a step further and included imperfect detection on prey estimates (through occupancy modeling, see “Single-species occupancy models” section) instead of using the number of captures. We considered small-sized mammals (< 1 kg; mainly small rodents and small marsupials) and small birds (< 0.2 g; mainly passerines and doves) as the main prey for margay and oncilla, and small and medium-sized mammals (< 13 kg; mainly small rodents, small marsupials, opossums, Brazilian rabbit, paca, armadillo, and porcupine) as well as small and medium-sized birds (< 0.5 g; passerines, doves, and tinamous) for ocelot [35, 57–61].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative abundance index from camera-trapping data was a capture rate index computed as the number of independent captures per 15 sampling days which is similar to other proposed abundance indices based on camera traps, such as the RAI index (Balme et al, 2009;Sarmento et al, 2010). Despite the difficulty to asses true abundance, these indices resulted useful proxies in studies of response of carnivore (and other wildlife communities) to varied conservation challenges or to study habitat-species relationships (Balme et al, 2009).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Although camera trapping is considered an adequate method for sampling relative abundance of carnivores (Balme et al, 2009;Sarmento et al, 2010), some species show low detectability rates in camera trapping studies. For example, genets, wildcats and badgers showed very low detectability rates in previous studies conducted in our study area (Virgós, own unpubl.…”
Section: Field Survey Procedures and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Camera trapping has proved to be one of the most useful tools for wildlife surveys as it is non-invasive and provides information on cryptic and inconspicuous species (Harmsen et al, 2009;Sarmento et al, 2009;Surnato et al, 2013). Data obtained from camera trapping can be used to study several topics of animal ecology such as inventories (Srbek-Araujo & Chiarello, 2005;Tobler et al, 2008), site occupancy (Mackenzie & Royle, 2005;O'Connell et al, 2006;Rich et al, 2013), patterns of spatial partitioning among species (Sarmento et al, 2011;Sollmann et al, 2012), temporal interactions between species as well as activity patterns (Foster et al, 2013;Frey et al, 2017). In the last two decades, several factors contributing to Neotropical carnivore coexistence have been studied using camera trapping (Vieira & Port, 2007;Di Bitetti et al, 2010;Bianchi et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%