2020
DOI: 10.1080/19313152.2020.1714159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Habitus and imagined ideals: Attending to (un)consciousness in discourses of (non)nativeness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is thus agency involved in the discourses through which speakers engage in scaling, and they may change their scalar perspectives to make claims of belonging, or they may change their practices to fit the scales that become relevant (c.f. Canagarajah & De Costa, 2016; Carr & Lempert, 2016; Djuraeva & Catedral, 2020). At the same time, this agency is always enacted in relation to, and constrained by more enduring scalar hierarchies and dominant norms for what belonging looks like across multiple contexts (c.f.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is thus agency involved in the discourses through which speakers engage in scaling, and they may change their scalar perspectives to make claims of belonging, or they may change their practices to fit the scales that become relevant (c.f. Canagarajah & De Costa, 2016; Carr & Lempert, 2016; Djuraeva & Catedral, 2020). At the same time, this agency is always enacted in relation to, and constrained by more enduring scalar hierarchies and dominant norms for what belonging looks like across multiple contexts (c.f.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, this study brings together multiple views on scale. On the one hand, scaling, or scalar perspective taking, is understood as an agentive process through which speakers position themselves within the larger social imaginary (Canagarajah & De Costa, 2016; Carr & Lempert, 2016; Djuraeva & Catedral, 2020). At the same time, scaling has also taken place at an institutional level over a sustained period of time such that it has led to world systems (Wallerstein, 1983) and corresponding ‘sociolinguistic scales’ that define how speakers are evaluated as they relate to different global, authoritative centers (Blommaert, 2007).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Narratives of lived experiences are constructed through invocations of certain times, spaces, and people, which can be discursively reconfigured at any given moment. This reconfiguration can be a matter of scaling, thus it can be ideologically oriented to higher scales of authority (Aydarova, 2016) or lower scales of real‐life experiences (Djuraeva & Catedral, 2020). Blommaert (2007) discusses scalar jumping as a way to communicate what is accepted, normal, or desired in a certain timeframe and within a certain scale.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars have applied chronotopes and scales in analyzing people's perceptions of language policy (Flowers, 2016), ethnolinguistic identity (Karimzad & Catedral, 2018), (non)nativeness (Djuraeva & Catedral, 2020), and globalization (Davidson, 2007). Bakhtin (1981) introduced the notion of chronotope as a discursive organization of language based on spatiotemporal categories.…”
Section: Chronotopes Scales and Scalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In my analysis, I view the multitude of different identity encapsulations across scales as chronotopic (Bakhtin 1981; see also Agha 2007;Blommaert 2015Blommaert , 2017. That is, identities and acts of identification are understood and performed in relation to particular time-space configurations through a process of scaling (see Canagarajah & De Costa 2016;Carr & Lempert 2016;Gal 2016;Catedral 2018;Djuraeva & Catedral 2020). I focus on how participants dynamically scale personhoods and the 2 Language in Society (2022) sociolinguistic behaviors and anxieties associated with them by attaching them to various microscopic and macroscopic chronotopes=timespaces in their discursive acts of identification.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%