2002
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.88.071802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hadronic Light-By-Light Scattering Contribution to the Muong2: An Effective Field Theory Approach

Abstract: The hadronic light-by-light contribution to a(mu), the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, is discussed from the point of view of an effective low-energy theory. As an application, the coefficient of the leading logarithm arising from the two-loop graphs involving two anomalous vertices is computed, and found to be positive. This corresponds to a positive sign for the pion-pole contribution to the hadronic light-by-light correction to a(mu), and to a sizable reduction of the discrepancy between the present … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
211
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 241 publications
(220 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
9
211
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(6.2), involving the positive definite weight function w f 1 (Q 1 , Q 2 ), contributes. This integral is divergent, and behaves as [49,51] lim…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(6.2), involving the positive definite weight function w f 1 (Q 1 , Q 2 ), contributes. This integral is divergent, and behaves as [49,51] lim…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current estimates for HLbL scattering in (g − 2) µ are largely based on hadronic models [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27], which despite implementing different limits of QCD, such as large-N c , chiral symmetry, or constraints from perturbative QCD, all involve a certain amount of uncontrollable uncertainties without offering a systematic path forward. In order to improve the determination of the HLbL contribution, we proposed a dispersive framework [28], based on the fundamental principles of analyticity, unitarity, gauge invariance, and crossing symmetry, which opens up a path towards a data-driven evaluation [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another caveat is that, although large values of the magnetic susceptibility χ 0 are disfavored, in the absence of stronger bounds on χ 0 , an additional (10 − 15)% systematic uncertainty on the previous value for a π 0 μ cannot be excluded. Modified ENJL [26][27][28] 59(9) VMD/HLS [29][30][31][32] 57(4) VMD+V (h 2 = 0) [33] 58(10) VMD+V (h 2 = −10 GeV 2 ) [33] 63(10) VMD+V (const.F π 0 γ * γ ) [37] 77(7) DSE [34,36] 58(7) Non local χQM [38] 65(2) AdS/QCD [21,39] 69 AdS/QCD/DIP [2] 65.4(2.5) RχT [40] 65.8(1.2) CχQM [41] 68(3) Table 3 shows a partial list of values of a π 0 μ obtained using different models, some of them discussed in other talks at this conference. Our numerical analysis showed also that the values of χ 0 hovered around 2 GeV −2 , as in the case shown in (18), with higher values disfavored although not definitely excluded.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%