Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Cited by 2 publications
References 4 publications
Background and aim The American College of Radiology (ACR) defines “actionable findings” the ones requiring a special communication between radiologists and referring clinicians, suggesting to organize their categorization in a three-degree scale on the basis of the risk for the patient to develop complications. These cases may fall in a grey-zone communication between different care figures with the risk of being underestimated or even not being considered at all. In this paper, our aim is to adapt the ACR categorization to the most frequent actionable findings encountered when reporting PET/CT images in a Nuclear Medicine Department, describing the most frequent and relevant imaging features and presenting the modalities of communication and the related clinical interventions that can be modulated by the prognostic severity of the clinical cases. Materials and methods We performed a descriptive, observational and critical analysis of the most relevant literature on the topic of “actionable findings”, in particular, starting from the reports of the ACR Actionable Reporting Work Group, we categorised and described, in a narrative review, the most relevant “actionable findings” encountered in the Nuclear Medicine PET/CT daily practice. Results To the best of our knowledge, to date there are no clear indications on this selective PET/CT topic, considering that the current recommendations target mainly radiologists and assume a certain level of radiological expertise. We resumed and classified the main imaging conditions under the term of “actionable findings” according to the corresponding anatomical districts, and we described their most relevant imaging features (independently of PET avidity or not). Furthermore, a different communication timing and strategy was suggested on the basis of the findings’ urgency. Conclusion A systematic categorization of the actionable imaging findings according to their prognostic severity may help the reporting physician to choose how and when to communicate with the referring clinician or to identify cases requiring a prompt clinical evaluation. Effective communication is a critical component of diagnostic imaging: timely receipt of the information is more important than the method of delivery.
Background and aim The American College of Radiology (ACR) defines “actionable findings” the ones requiring a special communication between radiologists and referring clinicians, suggesting to organize their categorization in a three-degree scale on the basis of the risk for the patient to develop complications. These cases may fall in a grey-zone communication between different care figures with the risk of being underestimated or even not being considered at all. In this paper, our aim is to adapt the ACR categorization to the most frequent actionable findings encountered when reporting PET/CT images in a Nuclear Medicine Department, describing the most frequent and relevant imaging features and presenting the modalities of communication and the related clinical interventions that can be modulated by the prognostic severity of the clinical cases. Materials and methods We performed a descriptive, observational and critical analysis of the most relevant literature on the topic of “actionable findings”, in particular, starting from the reports of the ACR Actionable Reporting Work Group, we categorised and described, in a narrative review, the most relevant “actionable findings” encountered in the Nuclear Medicine PET/CT daily practice. Results To the best of our knowledge, to date there are no clear indications on this selective PET/CT topic, considering that the current recommendations target mainly radiologists and assume a certain level of radiological expertise. We resumed and classified the main imaging conditions under the term of “actionable findings” according to the corresponding anatomical districts, and we described their most relevant imaging features (independently of PET avidity or not). Furthermore, a different communication timing and strategy was suggested on the basis of the findings’ urgency. Conclusion A systematic categorization of the actionable imaging findings according to their prognostic severity may help the reporting physician to choose how and when to communicate with the referring clinician or to identify cases requiring a prompt clinical evaluation. Effective communication is a critical component of diagnostic imaging: timely receipt of the information is more important than the method of delivery.
Background Roughly 5% of patients with blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) have a blunt bowel and/or mesenteric injury (BBMI). Determining the need for operative management in these patients can be challenging when hemodynamically stable. Single center studies have proposed scoring systems based on CT findings to guide management. Our study aimed to determine the predictability of abdominopelvic CT scan (CT A/P) findings in conjunction with clinical exam to determine the necessity of operative intervention for BBMI. Methods Patients presenting from 2017 to 2022 to the University of South Alabama Level 1 Trauma Center after motor vehicle collision were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with CT findings suggestive of BBMI were further analyzed, noting CT findings, Glasgow coma scale (GCS), shock index, abdominal exam, operative or nonoperative management, and intraoperative intervention. Results 1098 patients with BAT underwent CT A/P. 139 patients had ≥1 finding suggestive of BBMI. 38 patients underwent surgical exploration and 30 had surgically confirmed BBMI. 27 patients required intervention for BBMI. Univariate analysis indicated that pneumoperitoneum ( p < 0.0001), active extravasation of contrast ( p = 0.0001), hemoperitoneum without solid organ injury (SOI) ( p < 0.0001), peritonitis ( p < 0.0001), and mesenteric stranding( p < 0.05) were significantly associated with intervention. Conclusion In total, 30 patients had surgically confirmed BBMI. Active extravasation, pneumoperitoneum, hemoperitoneum without SOI, mesenteric stranding, and peritonitis were significant indicators of BBMI requiring intervention. CT and clinical findings cannot reliably predict the need for surgical intervention without ≥1 of these findings. Initial nonoperative management with serial clinical exams should be strongly considered to reduce incidence of nontherapeutic laparotomies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
Contact Info
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Product
Resources
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.
