2017
DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000000686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Half-body single photon emission computed tomography with resolution recovery for the evaluation of metastatic bone disease

Abstract: Reduced acquisition times together with RR allowed half-body SPECT for the evaluation of bone metastases to be accommodated within our department's schedule. Audit indicated that SPECT delivered the expected clinical advantages. Half-body SPECT has replaced planar imaging for the routine evaluation of metastatic bone disease at our centre, with ∼2500 studies carried out to date.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main reasons for fast SPECT acquisition are to reduce the high incidence of artifacts caused by poor patient compliance during acquisition and to increase patient throughput in busy nuclear medicine departments. Therefore, the RR OSEM modality is the most important factor for producing images with higher spatial resolution and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) than in conventional SPECT (8) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reasons for fast SPECT acquisition are to reduce the high incidence of artifacts caused by poor patient compliance during acquisition and to increase patient throughput in busy nuclear medicine departments. Therefore, the RR OSEM modality is the most important factor for producing images with higher spatial resolution and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) than in conventional SPECT (8) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches using medical X-ray tomography are very effective for 3D-reconstruction of tissues/organs [8]. We can also highlight some areas that are associated with the localization of implanted biomaterials [8,26], the colonoscopy, the ultrasonic sounding [9], the stereoscopic fluorescence imaging, the multispectral magnetic resonance image analysis [16], the single photon emission computed tomography (CT) [11], the electron tomography [6], the use of combined methods [9]. The transition begins from micro-CT to nano-CT [8,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%