2013
DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.365.5819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Half of the European fruit fly species barcoded (Diptera, Tephritidae); a feasibility test for molecular identification

Abstract: A feasibility test of molecular identification of European fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) based on COI barcode sequences has been executed. A dataset containing 555 sequences of 135 ingroup species from three subfamilies and 42 genera and one single outgroup species has been analysed. 73.3% of all included species could be identified based on their COI barcode gene, based on similarity and distances. The low success rate is caused by singletons as well as some problematic groups: several species groups wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(62 reference statements)
2
32
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, a high level of correspondence at the species level is observed between morphology and molecular species limits in the tree-based approach in the present study. The performance of DNA-based specimen identification in Diptera using COI differs greatly in the literature, which varies from less than 50% to near 100% congruence levels (Cywinska et al 2006, Smith et al 2006, Whitworth et al 2007, Rivera and Currie 2009, Meiklejohn et al 2012, Renaud et al 2012, Smit et al 2013, Contrearas et al 2014). In most of the studies, identification success rose upon relaxing the bootstrap requirement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, a high level of correspondence at the species level is observed between morphology and molecular species limits in the tree-based approach in the present study. The performance of DNA-based specimen identification in Diptera using COI differs greatly in the literature, which varies from less than 50% to near 100% congruence levels (Cywinska et al 2006, Smith et al 2006, Whitworth et al 2007, Rivera and Currie 2009, Meiklejohn et al 2012, Renaud et al 2012, Smit et al 2013, Contrearas et al 2014). In most of the studies, identification success rose upon relaxing the bootstrap requirement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA barcoding has a strong track record in delivering species-level identifications for the five insect orders with the most pest species-Coleoptera (Woodcock et al 2013;Rougerie et al 2015), Diptera (Nagy et al 2013;Smit et al 2013), Hemiptera (Park et al 2011b;Raupach et al 2014), Lepidoptera (Janzen et al 2005;Ashfaq et al 2013), and Thysanoptera (Rebijith et al 2014;Iftikhar et al 2016). For example, 92.2% of 3514 species of European beetles were assigned to a distinct BIN that coincided with a known morphological species, while most of the other species were assigned to two or three BINs, suggesting they represent cryptic species complexes (Hendrich et al 2015).…”
Section: Effectiveness Of Dna Barcodes For Arthropod Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Smit et al . ); however, no studies have evaluated the ability of DNA barcoding for fruit flies identification based on comprehensive analyses of all the public sequences in BOLD and much more new data. In this study, we used Bactrocera , which is the largest genus of Tephritidae, as a case study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Diptera, however, the identification success based on COI barcodes was relatively low due to the substantial overlaps in intra-and interspecific divergences (Meier et al 2006;Virgilio et al 2010). Tephritidae has been extensively studied from the perspective of DNA barcoding (Armstrong & Ball 2005;Van Houdt et al 2010;Barr et al 2012;Blacket et al 2012;Virgilio et al 2012;Smit et al 2013); however, no studies have evaluated the ability of DNA barcoding for fruit flies identification based on comprehensive analyses of all the public sequences in BOLD and much more new data. In this study, we used Bactrocera, which is the largest genus of Tephritidae, as a case study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%