1996
DOI: 10.1099/00207713-46-2-492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Halobacillus gen. nov., with Descriptions of Halobacillus litoralis sp. nov. and Halobacillus trueperi sp. nov., and Transfer of Sporosarcina halophila to Halobacillus halophilus comb. nov.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

8
227
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 258 publications
(236 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
8
227
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1). The predominant menaquinone and fatty acid profiles of B. halodenitrificans were similar to those of the genus Virgibacillus, although there are few clear-cut differences in chemotaxonomic characteristics between the genera Bacillus and Virgibacillus (Spring et al, 1996;Wainø et al, 1999;Yoon et al, 2002;Heyrman et al, 2003). B. halodenitrificans is also phylogenetically related to the genera Lentibacillus and Oceanobacillus.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…1). The predominant menaquinone and fatty acid profiles of B. halodenitrificans were similar to those of the genus Virgibacillus, although there are few clear-cut differences in chemotaxonomic characteristics between the genera Bacillus and Virgibacillus (Spring et al, 1996;Wainø et al, 1999;Yoon et al, 2002;Heyrman et al, 2003). B. halodenitrificans is also phylogenetically related to the genera Lentibacillus and Oceanobacillus.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…16s rRNA gene sequence analyses have identified at least 10 phylogenetic groups in the genus Bacillus (2, 3, 7 , 23, 26, 31, 33, 34, 36). Five of the groups have been reclassified as the new genera Alicyclobacillus (36), Paenibacillus (2), Halobacillus (33), Brevibacillus ( 3 l), and Aneurinibacillus (31). The genus Paenibacillus as proposed by Ash et al (2) consists of the following 11 species: Paenibacillus pobmyxa, Paenibacillus alvei, Paenibacillus gordonae, Paenibacillus larvae, Paenibacillus pulvifaciens, Paenibacillus macerans, Paenibacillus azotojkans, Paenibacillus pabuli, Paenibacillus macquariensis, Paenibacillus amylolyticus, and Paenibacillus validus.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, twelve new genera of aerobic sporeforming bacteria have been proposed : Alicyclobacillus (Wisotzkey et al, 1992), Amphibacillus (Niimura et al, 1990), Aneurinibacillus and Brevibacillus (Shida et al, 1996), Filobacillus (Schlesner et al, 2001), Geobacillus (Nazina et al, 2001), Halobacillus (Spring et al, 1996), Paenibacillus (Ash et al, 1993), Virgibacillus (Heyndrickx et al, 1998), Gracilibacillus and Salibacillus (Wainø et al, 1999) and Ureibacillus (Fortina et al, 2001). Many species and genus names used routinely in the current scientific literature are not present in Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology (Claus & Berkeley, 1986).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A prominent trend of current microbiological practice is the identification of microorganisms based only on 16S rRNA sequences, which provides rather limited resolution (Schloter et al, 2000 ;Stackebrandt & Goebel, 1994) incorrect identification and, more dangerously, to incorrect association of DNA sequences in a genetic database with particular species, which will multiply the error many times. It would be useful to supply scientists with a method to check quickly whether their strains identified by 16S rRNA agree with the corresponding species characteristics.In recent years, twelve new genera of aerobic sporeforming bacteria have been proposed : Alicyclobacillus (Wisotzkey et al, 1992), Amphibacillus (Niimura et al, 1990), Aneurinibacillus and Brevibacillus (Shida et al, 1996), Filobacillus (Schlesner et al, 2001), Geobacillus (Nazina et al, 2001), Halobacillus (Spring et al, 1996), Paenibacillus (Ash et al, 1993), Virgibacillus (Heyndrickx et al, 1998), Gracilibacillus and Salibacillus (Wainø et al, 1999) and Ureibacillus (Fortina et al, 2001). Many species and genus names used routinely in the current scientific literature are not present in Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology (Claus & Berkeley, 1986).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%