2013
DOI: 10.1134/s0026261713040097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Halophilic and halotolerant aerobic methylobacteria from the technogenic Solikamsk biotopes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moderately halophilic methylobacteria survive in media containing up to 3 M NaCl (optimally at 0.5–1 M). They belong to the classes Alphaproteobacteria (genera Methylarcula , Leisingera , Methyloligella , Paracoccus ) and Gammaproteobacteria (genera Methylophaga , Methylohalomonas , Methylonatrum ) (Poroshina et al , 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moderately halophilic methylobacteria survive in media containing up to 3 M NaCl (optimally at 0.5–1 M). They belong to the classes Alphaproteobacteria (genera Methylarcula , Leisingera , Methyloligella , Paracoccus ) and Gammaproteobacteria (genera Methylophaga , Methylohalomonas , Methylonatrum ) (Poroshina et al , 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Members of the genus Paracoccus are metabolically versatile and have been isolated from soil (Dastager et al, 2011;Nguyen et al, 2015;Sun et al, 2015), sediment (Pan et al, 2014;Jung et al, 2014), activated sludge (Lee et al, 2011;Lee & Lee, 2013;Sun et al, 2013), root nodules (Deng et al, 2011), cornetfish (Kim et al, 2010) and marine environments . At the time of writing, the genus Paracoccus included 46 species with validly published names, with recent introduction of Paracoccus fistulariae (Kim et al, 2010); P. sphaerophysae (Deng et al, 2011); P. caeni (Lee et al, 2011); P. isoporae ; P. stylophorae ; P. rhizosphaerae (K€ ampfer et al, 2012); P. niistensis (Dastager et al, 2011); P. tibetensis (Zhu et al, 2012); P. limosus (Lee & Lee, 2013); P. huijuniae (Sun et al, 2013); P. communis (Poroshina et al, 2013); P. sediminis (Pan et al, 2014); P. lutimaris (Jung et al, 2014); P. pacificus ; P. panacisoli (Nguyen et al, 2015); P. sanguinis (McGinnis et al, 2015); P. angustae (Sun et al, 2015) and P. cavernae (Dominguez-Moñino et al, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most species of this genus utilize a wide variety of organic compounds as carbon sources, and some show chemolithoautotrophic growth using CO 2 as a carbon source. This genus contains 43 recognized species, including the recently described ‘ Paracoccus angustae ’ (Sun et al , 2015), P. communis (Poroshina et al , 2013), P. huijuniae (Sun et al , 2013), P. limosus (Lee & Lee, 2013), P. lutimaris (Jung et al , 2014), P. panacisoli (Nguyen et al , 2015), P. sanguinis (McGuinnis et al , 2015), P. sediminis (Pan et al , 2014) and P. tibetensis (Zhu et al , 2013). These species were isolated from a variety of environmental habitats, including soil, water, root nodules and activated sludge, and some were isolated from clinical specimens.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%