1952
DOI: 10.1021/jo50011a019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hammett's Sigma Constants in Certain Electrophilic Reactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

1954
1954
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The slope of the line of Figure 1 is -1.94 which does not differ significantly from the slope ( -1.95) previously calculated (2).…”
supporting
confidence: 44%
“…The slope of the line of Figure 1 is -1.94 which does not differ significantly from the slope ( -1.95) previously calculated (2).…”
supporting
confidence: 44%
“…found that there is a linear relationship that accommodates the various sets of a+-values (38, 39,66,67,180,191,196,197). Using the Brown and Okamoto set as standards (a+), as in equation 51 U + = u + ?…”
Section: (119)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The values of the substituent constants are highly dependent on the choice of reference reaction and may not be reliable for other reactions. [238][239][240] Hammett's method also easily overfits towards the reference reaction, meaning its predictions will be good for the reference reaction, but poorer for others. Thus, it was the work of Bragato et al 148 to form a new Hammett method such that the substituent constants could become more transferable and the overall model be made more reliable for different reactions.…”
Section: δ-Ml For Activation Energy Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Hammett's original method is saddled with some significant disadvantages. The values of the substituent constants are highly dependent on the choice of reference reaction and may not be reliable for other reactions 238–240 . Hammett's method also easily overfits towards the reference reaction, meaning its predictions will be good for the reference reaction, but poorer for others.…”
Section: For Activation Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%