1997
DOI: 10.1177/004947559702700417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hand and Foot Sepsis in Libyan Diabetic Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The most useful African studies available are those from Nigeria 8 and Libya. 13 The frequency of hand sepsis was remarkably similar in the two -5/158 patients (3.2 %) in Nigeria and 25/814 in Libya (3.1 %), as was the female excess (80 % in Nigeria and 74 % in Libya). Mean ages were 41 years and 51 years, respectively.…”
Section: Aetiology and Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The most useful African studies available are those from Nigeria 8 and Libya. 13 The frequency of hand sepsis was remarkably similar in the two -5/158 patients (3.2 %) in Nigeria and 25/814 in Libya (3.1 %), as was the female excess (80 % in Nigeria and 74 % in Libya). Mean ages were 41 years and 51 years, respectively.…”
Section: Aetiology and Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Of Akintewe and colleagues original 5 cases, 8 4 had finger amputations (80 %), and the fifth patient took their own discharge. In the series of 60 cases reported by Bosseri and Gill, 13 there was an 11 % amputation rate, again mostly of digits. This was, however, a retrospective 'status of survivors' study.…”
Section: Outcome and Managementmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1,2,13,17,21,22 Reports from North Africa suggest that TDSH patients from that region may have more favorable outcomes than those from sub-Saharan Africa. 13,21,22 TDHS may follow minor trauma to the hand that the patient may ignore or forget; in some patients however, there is no identifiable cause. 16 Trauma was identifiable in only 2 patients (20%) in the current study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%