1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-1947-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handbook of Research Methods in Human Operant Behavior

Abstract: Springer Science+ Business Media, LLCL1brary of Cangress Catalag1ng-1n-Pub11cat1an Data Handbook of research 111ethods in hu11an operant behavlor 1 ed1ted by Kennon A. Lat ta 1 and M1 chae 1 Perene. p. c•. --

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 650 publications
(1,080 reference statements)
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Select and reject controls have been a constant topic in matching-to-sample studies over the years (Berryman, Cumming, Cohen, & Johnson, 1965;Carr et al, 2000;de Rose et al, 2013;Dixon & Dixon, 1978;Johnson & Sidman, 1993;Kato, de Rose, & Faleiros, 2008;McIlvane et al, 1984;Stromer & Osborne, 1982). It is a relevant topic, especially because these different types of stimulus control seem to underlie different cases of complex behavior such as generalized identity or oddity from sample (Santi, 1982;Urcuioli, 1977;Urcuioli & Nevin, 1975), learning by exclusion (McIlvane, Kledaras, Munson, King, de Rose, & Stoddard, 1987;McIlvane, Munson, & Stoddard, 1988;Wilkinson, Dube, & McIlvane, 1996;Wilkinson & McIlvane, 1997), generalized conditional responding (Saunders & Spradlin, 1990Saunders & Williams, 1998) and equivalence itself (Carr et al, 2000;de Rose et al, 2013;Kato et al, 2008). Carrigan and Sidman's (1992) theoretical article proposes a research agenda that is worth pursuing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Select and reject controls have been a constant topic in matching-to-sample studies over the years (Berryman, Cumming, Cohen, & Johnson, 1965;Carr et al, 2000;de Rose et al, 2013;Dixon & Dixon, 1978;Johnson & Sidman, 1993;Kato, de Rose, & Faleiros, 2008;McIlvane et al, 1984;Stromer & Osborne, 1982). It is a relevant topic, especially because these different types of stimulus control seem to underlie different cases of complex behavior such as generalized identity or oddity from sample (Santi, 1982;Urcuioli, 1977;Urcuioli & Nevin, 1975), learning by exclusion (McIlvane, Kledaras, Munson, King, de Rose, & Stoddard, 1987;McIlvane, Munson, & Stoddard, 1988;Wilkinson, Dube, & McIlvane, 1996;Wilkinson & McIlvane, 1997), generalized conditional responding (Saunders & Spradlin, 1990Saunders & Williams, 1998) and equivalence itself (Carr et al, 2000;de Rose et al, 2013;Kato et al, 2008). Carrigan and Sidman's (1992) theoretical article proposes a research agenda that is worth pursuing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At Clark, Dresslar focussed on more basic behavioral issues, including the sensation of touch and the nature of repetitive performance (Dresslar, 1892(Dresslar, , 1894. His article, "Some Influences Which Affect the Rapidity of Voluntary Movements" (Dresslar, 1892), may contain the earliest published cumulative record of psychologically significant behavior (see Figure 6; see also Wixted, 1998). Dresslar used a modified clock movement to transform linear motion into rotary motion, then used the clock's second hand to wind up a string attached to a kymograph stylus.…”
Section: Fletcher B Dresslar's 1892mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por otra parte, en la discriminación condicional las funciones E D y E ∆ cambian dependiendo de la ocurrencia de otro evento denominado estímulo condicional (E C ) (Mackay, 1991). Es preciso resaltar que en la discriminación simple las funciones E D y E ∆ se mantienen constantes o son absolutas en su relación con el reforzamiento de la respuesta, mientras que en la discriminación condicional las funciones E D y E ∆ se caracterizan por ser variables o relativas en su relación con el estímulo condicional y el reforzamiento de la respuesta (Saunders & Williams, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Ahora bien, se suele considerar que el proceso por excelencia mediante el cual se establece el control discriminativo es el reforzamiento diferencial. La presentación u omisión del reforzador ante la respuesta que ocurre frente a cambios de estímulo en la discriminación simple, o frente a relaciones estímulo-estímulo en la discriminación condicional, permite mayor diferenciación de las contingencias positivas y negativas implicadas en las funciones E D o E ∆ absolutas o relativas, respectivamente (Green & Saunders, 1998;Harrison, 1991;Mackay, 1991;Saunders & Williams, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified