1861
DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.124912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handbook to the ferns of New Zealand : chiefly compiled from Dr. Hooker's "Flora Novae Zealandiae," Sir Wm. J. Hooker's "Species Filicum," &c

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is inferior in attachment, globose and becomes saucer-shaped enclosing the sporangia, but is later obscured by the developing sporangia. Hypoderris was first described by Brown in Hooker (1838) and was placed in Polypodiaceae (Hooker 1844, Maxon 1926, Christensen 1934. Brown thought Hypoderris to be close to Woodsia R.Br., but he also stated that its leaves have a similar structure to that of some Polypodium L. or Aspidium Sw. Based on its unique morphological and anatomical characters, including petioles with four vascular strands and the indusia and sori described above, Bower (1928) suggested placing the genus in Woodsieae, which he considered to be part of the dryopterid ferns.…”
Section: Focal Generamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is inferior in attachment, globose and becomes saucer-shaped enclosing the sporangia, but is later obscured by the developing sporangia. Hypoderris was first described by Brown in Hooker (1838) and was placed in Polypodiaceae (Hooker 1844, Maxon 1926, Christensen 1934. Brown thought Hypoderris to be close to Woodsia R.Br., but he also stated that its leaves have a similar structure to that of some Polypodium L. or Aspidium Sw. Based on its unique morphological and anatomical characters, including petioles with four vascular strands and the indusia and sori described above, Bower (1928) suggested placing the genus in Woodsieae, which he considered to be part of the dryopterid ferns.…”
Section: Focal Generamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, easily observed synapomorphies distinguishing the various clades of cheilanthoid ferns are few, and homoplastic characters abound. To paraphrase Sir William Hooker (1852 : 75), “Vain is the attempt to form a definite character which shall decide the limits of [ Cheilanthes ],” a statement that applies equally well to Myriopteris . Highly divided (decompound) leaf blades with small ultimate segments are scattered across the cheilanthoid tree and, indeed, are characteristic of ferns in general, and an indument of hairs and/or scales is one common strategy among plants used to reduce water loss in xeric habitats ( Hevly 1963 ).…”
Section: Historical Use Of the Name Myriopterismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tectaria chinensis is the sole species in Tectaria from China and Vietnam which is featured by the veins forming costal and costular areoles (lacking free included veinlets) combined with sori dorsal on anastomosing veins (as well dorsal on free veins). In the whole range of Indochina, there are only two species, T. chattagramica (Clarke 1880: 548) Ching (1931 and T. tenerifrons (Hooker 1864: 104) Ching (1931, possessing the similar venation and the sori feature as in T. chinensis. Evidently T. chinensis is very different from the two species in other characters, such as the long-erect caudex (short in T. chattagramica or long-creeping in T. tenerifrons), copiously scaly stipe (glabrous in both T. chattagramica and T. tenerifrons), and dark brown stipe and rachis (polished and castaneous in T. chattagramica or light stramineous in T. tenerifrons).…”
Section: Taxonomic Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%