2019
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/ab3372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handling leakage with subsystem codes

Abstract: Leakage is a particularly damaging error that occurs when a qubit state falls out of its two-level computational subspace. Compared to independent depolarizing noise, leaked qubits may produce many more configurations of harmful correlated errors during error-correction. In this work, we investigate different local codes in the low-error regime of a leakage gate error model. When restricting to bare-ancilla extraction, we observe that subsystem codes are good candidates for handling leakage, as their locality … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also point out that in general, topological codes without leakage reduction units [58] are not robust against leakage errors that occur when a bare qubit state is excited and falls out of its desired two-level subspace [58][59][60][61]. In the case of the surface-GKP code, leakage errors do occur as well because each bosonic mode may not be in the desired two-level GKP code subspace.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also point out that in general, topological codes without leakage reduction units [58] are not robust against leakage errors that occur when a bare qubit state is excited and falls out of its desired two-level subspace [58][59][60][61]. In the case of the surface-GKP code, leakage errors do occur as well because each bosonic mode may not be in the desired two-level GKP code subspace.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, in Ref. [43] it was shown how some families of subsystem codes achieve better error correcting capabilities compared to the surface code in the presence of leakage errors. An interesting direction for future work would be to analyze the performance of codes defined on low degree graphs in the presence of leakage errors to see if such codes also have favorable error correcting capabilities compared to more standard implementations such as in the surface code.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, leakage can last over many QEC cycles, despite having a finite duration set by the relaxation time 36 . Hence, leakage represents a menacing error source in the context of quantum error correction 17,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] , despite leakage probabilities per operation being smaller than readout, control or decoherence error probabilities 6,8,9,44 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%