2003 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking, 2003. WCNC 2003.
DOI: 10.1109/wcnc.2003.1200546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handoff performance of mobile host and mobile router employing HMIP extension

Abstract: Mobility support for mobile networks will be more important as the mobile Internet becomes increasingly popular. To support mobile networks, the concept of prefix scope binding (PSB) is being discussed in IETF; however, by only applying this concept to Mobile IPv6 (MIP), the problem of packet loss still remains. In this paper, we apply the PSB concept to our proposed protocol, the Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 extension with buffering function (HMIP-B), in which mobility anchor points buffer packets destined to the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The procedure of data transmission in conventional IP-based mobility management schemes, such as MIPv6, HMIPv6 and FMIPv6, is discussed in many publications such as [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. When a CN sends packets with a MN's home-ofaddress (HoA), the home agent (HA) in the MN's home network intercepts and forwards them to the MN's CoA with IP-in-IP tunneling.…”
Section: Data Transmission Between Mn and Cnmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The procedure of data transmission in conventional IP-based mobility management schemes, such as MIPv6, HMIPv6 and FMIPv6, is discussed in many publications such as [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. When a CN sends packets with a MN's home-ofaddress (HoA), the home agent (HA) in the MN's home network intercepts and forwards them to the MN's CoA with IP-in-IP tunneling.…”
Section: Data Transmission Between Mn and Cnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much research on seamless IP mobility has been carried out for developing handoff protocols based on an IP layer [5], such as mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) [6], hierarchical mobile IPv6 (HMIPv6) in [7], fast handover for mobile IPv6 (FMIPv6) in [8], and so on [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) has proposed the Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) as the basic mobility management protocol for IPv6-based wireless/mobile networks [5,6,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the hierarchical property, longer handoff latency usually leads to the conditions of higher session blocking and longer transmission delay when an MR (MN) moves away from the current service area of an AR (MR). Therefore, the improvement in handoff latency of a hierarchical mobile system [4][5][6] has been an important issue. Another load balancing issue for the NEMO systems was investigated in [7,8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MN employs four NICs: the satellite terminal emulator (STE), IEEE802.11b wireless LAN (WLAN), Ethernet, and modem (PPP). We also employ a Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 extension with a buffering function (HMIP-B) [6], in which mobility anchor points (MAPs) buffer packets destined to the MNs during handoff as an example of the IP mobility management protocol for MSIN. The testbed has two network parts, one for the Internet Service Provider the other for the Internet, configured with 5 and 50 millisecond latency periods, respectively.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%