1998
DOI: 10.1086/461894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hands-On Biology: A Museum-School-University Partnership for Enhancing Students' Interest and Learning in Science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
51
0
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
51
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…During a field trip, active participation in structured museum activities (hands-on activities, inquiry-based problem solving, discussion with peers, etc.) promotes student motivation (S. Hidi, Weiss, Berndorff, & Nolan, 1998;Paris, Yambor, & Packard, 1998) and learning (Cox-Petersen, Marsh, Kisiel, & Melber, 2003;Mortensen & Smart, 2007;Tofield, et al, 2003). Educational impact is increased by post-visit activities (D. Anderson, et al, 2000;Davidson, et al, 2010;Griffin, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During a field trip, active participation in structured museum activities (hands-on activities, inquiry-based problem solving, discussion with peers, etc.) promotes student motivation (S. Hidi, Weiss, Berndorff, & Nolan, 1998;Paris, Yambor, & Packard, 1998) and learning (Cox-Petersen, Marsh, Kisiel, & Melber, 2003;Mortensen & Smart, 2007;Tofield, et al, 2003). Educational impact is increased by post-visit activities (D. Anderson, et al, 2000;Davidson, et al, 2010;Griffin, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While investigations into the effectiveness of inquiry as an instructional strategy have shown promise for increasing students' understanding of science (Chang and Mao 1999;Ertepinar and Geban 1996;Hakkarainen 2003), the nature of science (Schwartz et al 2004), and increasing students' interest and attitudes toward science (Cavallo and Laubach 2001;Chang and Mao 1999;Paris et al 1998), there remains debates, as well as problems of enactment. One example of the debates that can be found emerge as Settlage (2007) Johnston (2008) challenges these ideas in a response to Settlage (2007) as he argues that Settlage seemed to neglect that inquiry is not simply a teaching tool, but a teaching goal… It is a scientific endeavor in itself, allowing students to be themselves within a culture of scientific inquiry… The processes embraced by science that allow us to extract explanation from evidence are paramount to a citizen's understanding of science… Alas, in an era of highstakes testing in which much of science is stripped of its inquiry processes in favor of content factoids, it must be our obligation to make open inquiry a learning objective in our classrooms.…”
Section: Inquiry As An Instructional Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Henriksen and Jorde (2001) discovered that students not only reinforced prior knowledge after a museum visit but also learned the concepts they have met for the first time in the informal museum environment. According to Paris et al (1998), out-of-school activities can provide a certain level of increase in students' interest in science and can facilitate development in students' problem solving skills.…”
Section: Findings Regarding Predicting the Interest Scores Of The 8thmentioning
confidence: 99%