“…Our group has begun to employ strain gauge and handwriting kinematic assessments of motor pathology, which provide continuous variables that are more sensitive than observer-based methods, identifying individuals with overt dyskinesias as well as those who only have subclinical movement pathology (Cortese et al, 2005; Dean and Mittal, 2015; Dean et al, 2016; Dean et al, 2013). Our earlier work combining observer-based ratings of dyskinetic movement abnormalities with cognitive deficits in adolescents with prodromal syndromes showed some promise for predicting psychosis (sensitivity= 60.0%, specificity = 76.0%, PPV = 43.0%, NPV = 86.3%) (Mittal et al, 2010).…”