2021
DOI: 10.1109/tmech.2020.3041225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Haptic Display Responsive to Touch Driven by Soft Actuator and Soft Sensor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the DEA can be used to sense the deformations impressed by a user, and provide a vibrotactile stimulus and a superposed sound feedback. Despite their simplicity, these case studies demonstrate that DEA multi‐functionality might be used in the future to develop compact lightweight multi‐modal interfaces capable of collocated audio‐tactile feedback, [ 29–32 ] or buttons with programmable audio and tactile click feedback. [ 33 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, the DEA can be used to sense the deformations impressed by a user, and provide a vibrotactile stimulus and a superposed sound feedback. Despite their simplicity, these case studies demonstrate that DEA multi‐functionality might be used in the future to develop compact lightweight multi‐modal interfaces capable of collocated audio‐tactile feedback, [ 29–32 ] or buttons with programmable audio and tactile click feedback. [ 33 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the DEA can be used to sense the deformations impressed by a user, and provide a vibrotactile stimulus and a superposed sound feedback. Despite their simplicity, these case studies demonstrate that DEA multifunctionality might be used in the future to develop compact lightweight multi-modal interfaces capable of collocated audiotactile feedback, [29][30][31][32] or buttons with programmable audio and tactile click feedback. [33] The multi-frequency, multi-mode principle proposed here leverages and takes advantage of some general features of DEAs, such as surface-distributed actuation which allows exciting different deformation modes of the same membrane via a single input.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, thermal feedback is slow in response, and developing electric feedback requires stimulation with a microcurrent, making wide acceptance challenging. Human body signals can be detected using various signals such as EMG, [30,57] temperature, [30] bending, [42,59] and pressure [30,45,47] signals. Surface EMG signals are highly susceptible to noise and necessitate the use of machine learning algorithms to indirectly recognize them, resulting in a bulky and expensive interface.…”
Section: Comparison and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[39][40][41] However, when the precise sensing ability of the sensing materials is solely focused on, the constructed device is often an open-loop system, which lacks a feedback mechanism for users to utilize their intelligence and experience in a dynamic environment. To provide realistic feedback to the user, various actuators have been deployed at the interaction interface, [42][43][44] including dielectric elastomer actuators, [45][46][47][48] pneumatic elastomer actuators, [45,[49][50][51] electromagnetic actuators, [52][53][54][55][56] thermal-tactile actuators, [57] electro-tactile actuators, [58,59] and so on. Existing flexible wearable interactive interfaces can acquire signals from particular body parts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thresholds in steering control signals may be caused by lash (or free play) in the steering system, by limitations in human perception (sensory thresholds), and by impedances associated to motor response due to the viscoelasticity of the muscles [14], [15]. These thresholds can be absolute (such as those in visual perception [16]) or differential (Weber's Law as an example [17]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%