2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr.2017.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hard substrate in the deep ocean: How sediment features influence epibenthic megafauna on the eastern Canadian margin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences in abundances and assemblage structure between sides of the seamount is likely instead influenced by POC and the westward current ( Table 2). Increases in rugosity, substrate variability, and slope variability increase habitat complexity, which has been shown to support higher levels of diversity, which in turn affects assemblage structure (Lacharité and Metaxas, 2017).…”
Section: Assemblage Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences in abundances and assemblage structure between sides of the seamount is likely instead influenced by POC and the westward current ( Table 2). Increases in rugosity, substrate variability, and slope variability increase habitat complexity, which has been shown to support higher levels of diversity, which in turn affects assemblage structure (Lacharité and Metaxas, 2017).…”
Section: Assemblage Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of hard substrata, in the form of dropstones, to soft-sediment dominated benthic landscapes at fjord and shelf floors enhances habitat heterogeneity, potentially influencing biodiversity. Habitat heterogeneity has been shown to increase diversity in many ecosystems, ranging from forests to abyssal plains (MacArthur & Wilson 1967, Simberloff 1974, Huston 1979, McClintock et al 2005, Schön-berg & Fromont 2012, Amon et al 2016), but the contribution of glacial debris to habitat heterogeneity has been assessed at only a few locations on continental shelves (Oschmann 1990, Starmans et al 1999, Schulz et al 2010, Meyer et al 2015, Lacharité & Metaxas 2017. On the Antarctic shelf, the most influential factors affecting benthic biodiversity are postulated to be disturbance (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6E). Unlike the tetractinellid sponge grounds of the Flemish Cap, which primarily settle on soft sandy/ muddy substrate with few cobbles and boulders, V. pourtalesi settles on hard substrate, which has also shown to increase habitat complexity and enhance the diversity of local fauna (Lacharité & Metaxas 2017). The presence of V. pourtalesi and percent cover of hard substrate were both statistically significant predictors of species density and abundance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We compare the composition of species, diversity, and abundance of epibenthos from in situ photographs collected in areas with and without the presence of V. pourtalesi. Using generalized linear models (GLMs), the importance of this sponge ground in enhancing fine-scale diversity and abundance of the associated megafauna was evaluated against that of the presence (percent cover) of hard substrate, which has also been shown to enhance the diversity of local fauna in deep-sea environments (Lacharité & Metaxas 2017). Furthermore, broader-scale associations between V. pourtalesi and bentho-pelagic fish and invertebrate species collected from the DFO bottom trawl surveys were examined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%