2017
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1703.06305
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hardness of almost embedding simplicial complexes in $\mathbb R^d$

Arkadiy Skopenkov,
Martin Tancer

Abstract: A map f : K → R d of a simplicial complex is an almost embedding if f (σ) ∩ f (τ ) = ∅ whenever σ, τ are disjoint simplices of K.Theorem. Fix integers d, k ≥ 2 such that d = 3k 2 + 1. (a) Assume that P = N P . Then there exists a finite k-dimensional complex K that does not admit an almost embedding in R d but for which there exists an equivariant map K → S d−1 .(b) The algorithmic problem of recognition almost embeddability of finite k-dimensional complexes in R d is NP hard.The proof is based on the techniqu… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…M. Tancer suggests that it is plausible to approach the conjecture the same way as in [MTW11,ST17]. Namely, one can possibly triangulate the gadgets in advance and glue them together so that the 'embeddable gadgets' would be linearly embeddable with respect to the prescribed triangulations.…”
Section: Algorithmic Recognition Of Almost Realizablity Of Hypergraphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…M. Tancer suggests that it is plausible to approach the conjecture the same way as in [MTW11,ST17]. Namely, one can possibly triangulate the gadgets in advance and glue them together so that the 'embeddable gadgets' would be linearly embeddable with respect to the prescribed triangulations.…”
Section: Algorithmic Recognition Of Almost Realizablity Of Hypergraphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its generalizations (to Z r -valued invariants and to cohomological obstructions) are defined and used to obtain elementary formulations and proofs of §1 and §2 mentioned above. For applications of another generalizations see [Sk16,§4], [Sk16',ST17]. For invariants of plane curves and caustics see [Ar95] and references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lemma 1.3 is a stronger version of [SS92, Lemma 1.4] (in [SS92] it was assumed that f | Σ ℓ is an embedding). This stronger version is essentially proved in [ST17,§3], see a sketch of a proof in §2. (The proof of the stronger version uses a simpler argument: application of Lemma 2.4 instead of the cohomological Smith index as in [SS92,§1].…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…(a) Our proof of the Singular Borromean Rings Lemma 2.4 for n = 2 and l = 1 gives a shorter, elementary proof of the result from[FKT] mentioned before Theorem 1.6. (b) In[ST17], the Singular Borromean Rings Lemma 2.4 is used to study algorithmic aspects of almost 2-embeddability of complexes in R d . (c) The analogue of the Singular Borromean Rings Lemma 2.4 for n = l + 1 = 1 is true, although our proof does not work for this case.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%