2022
DOI: 10.1109/tvlsi.2022.3170596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hardware-Efficient, On-the-Fly, On-Implant Spike Sorter Dedicated to Brain-Implantable Microsystems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. 15 compares the clustering accuracy achieved by our NSP against well-established and commonly used offline software algorithms [8] and state-ofthe-art online spike-sorting chips [14], [15], [16], [17] for the two different ground-truth datasets. Our fixed-point simulations show that for the multichannel Neuropixels datasets, the clustering accuracy of our NSP outperforms two software tools and is close to the highest level on every dataset.…”
Section: A Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Fig. 15 compares the clustering accuracy achieved by our NSP against well-established and commonly used offline software algorithms [8] and state-ofthe-art online spike-sorting chips [14], [15], [16], [17] for the two different ground-truth datasets. Our fixed-point simulations show that for the multichannel Neuropixels datasets, the clustering accuracy of our NSP outperforms two software tools and is close to the highest level on every dataset.…”
Section: A Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with recently reported on-chip spike sorters, this work achieves the highest number of input channels and the smallest area per channel thanks to our careful co-optimizations between the algorithms and the circuitarchitecture decisions. Despite the extra complexity added by the spatiotemporal dimensionality and the higher input bitwidth (12 bits) and sampling rate (30 kHz), we achieve a power consumption comparable to [16], [17] by reducing the computational complexity based on the geometry information of the electrode array. While the design in [14] achieves a high number of channels with much lower power, that work uses a lower input bit-width and sampling rate, a smaller SRAM (39 kB), and highly empirical SD and FE algorithms that do not require multipliers, but that may not be applicable to different spike shapes.…”
Section: B Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The step of feature extraction within the spike-sorting system is used in order to select, among all the samples collected to represent the spike waveform, the more discriminative ones, which are used to obtain a sort of dimensionality reduction of the data, to be used in the following clustering phase. The main features extraction approaches adopted in the literature are [18] as follows:…”
Section: Features Extraction Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%