“…Even by carefully controlling all these sources of variability as much as possible, there still remain reproducibility issues between scanners of the same model or in scan‐rescan studies of dMRI metrics (Kristo et al, 2013; Magnotta et al, 2012; Vollmar et al, 2010). Over the years, many algorithms have been developed to mitigate the variability attributed to nonbiological effects in dMRI, for example, in order to combine data sets from multiple studies and increase statistical power, see for example, (Pinto et al, 2020; Tax et al, 2019; Zhu, Moyer, Nir, Thompson, & Jahanshad, 2019) for reviews. Common approaches consist in harmonizing the dMRI data sets through the coefficients of a spherical harmonics representation (Blumberg et al, 2019; Cetin Karayumak et al, 2019; Mirzaalian et al, 2016) or the computed scalar metrics (Fortin et al, 2017; Pohl et al, 2016) to reduce variability between scanners.…”