2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Harmonization of multi-site diffusion tensor imaging data

Abstract: Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is a well-established magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique used for studying microstructural changes in the white matter. As with many other imaging modalities, DTI images suffer from technical between-scanner variation that hinders comparisons of images across imaging sites, scanners and over time. Using fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) maps of 205 healthy participants acquired on two different scanners, we show that the DTI measurements are highly site… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

13
857
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 897 publications
(872 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
13
857
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the excellent performance of ComBat in DTI (Fortin et al, 2017), MRI-based cortical thickness (Fortin et al, 2018), and fMRI (current study) measurements, we conclude that this harmonization method is a reliable and powerful technique that can be widely applied to different neuroimaging modalities and summary measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Given the excellent performance of ComBat in DTI (Fortin et al, 2017), MRI-based cortical thickness (Fortin et al, 2018), and fMRI (current study) measurements, we conclude that this harmonization method is a reliable and powerful technique that can be widely applied to different neuroimaging modalities and summary measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Based on the literature (Friedman et al, 2008; Feis et al, 2015; Rath et al, 2016; Dansereau et al, 2017), we speculated that measurements such as DTI fractional anisotropy (Fortin et al, 2017), MRI cortical thickness (Fortin et al, 2018), and fMRI functional connectivity (the present study) would differ among the four sites (CU, MGH, TX and UM) due to systematic bias and non-biological variability attributable to the use of different scanners and different imaging parameters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Differences between demographic data were tested with Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon’s U test for numerical variables and with Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. To further check that data were not primarily driven by site effects, we checked that the results were reproduced using an independent data harmonization approach [22] (see the Results section in the online supplementary materials). Further details on model selection and assumptions are provided in the online supplementary materials.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…or processing pipeline can be used if the model is modified using domain adaptation or fine‐tuning using a much smaller dataset of new data. Additionally, MRI harmonization approaches could be used to ensure image uniformity across various scanner sites …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%