2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11538-016-0201-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Harnessing Intra-Host Strain Competition to Limit Antibiotic Resistance: Mathematical Model Results

Abstract: Antibiotic overuse has promoted the spread of antibiotic resistance. To compound the issue, treating individuals dually infected with antibiotic-resistant and antibiotic-vulnerable strains can make their infections completely resistant through competitive release. We formulate mathematical models of transmission dynamics accounting for dual infections and extensions accounting for lag times between infection and treatment or between cure and ending treatment. Analysis using the Next-Generation Matrix reveals h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One paper [ 23 ] compared SIR models of four, six, eight and 12 compartments to include dual infection and time lag between treatment and AMR development. The inclusion of dual infections covers situations where patients may recover to a state with a coexistence of strains or strain takeover by the sensitive or resistant strain, depending on parameters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One paper [ 23 ] compared SIR models of four, six, eight and 12 compartments to include dual infection and time lag between treatment and AMR development. The inclusion of dual infections covers situations where patients may recover to a state with a coexistence of strains or strain takeover by the sensitive or resistant strain, depending on parameters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While most articles describe to some extent the source(s) of data used to parameterise the model (86%), 11 articles do not comment on the source of the input values [41, 68, 71, 74, 77, 84, 85, 89, 107, 108, 113]. An additional eight articles rely solely on expert opinion or ‘guesstimates’ to parameterise the model and/or purposively choose values in order to highlight specific dynamic behaviours [33, 40, 52, 81, 86, 95, 106, 110].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional outcomes of interest include the likelihood of and/or time to resistance emergence or extinction [65, 66, 78, 83, 86, 87, 91, 93, 97, 98, 110], the likelihood of coexistence (i.e. of sensitive and resistant strains) [59, 62, 80, 106], the fraction of resistant infections attributable to antibiotic use [71, 96, 97, 101] and the number of treatment failures or inappropriately-treated patients [58, 66, 104]. The outcome of interest in four articles [94, 98100] is the distribution of resistance levels determined by the minimum inhibitory concentration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within-host competition creates frequency-dependent selection for resistance (24,25,(31)(32)(33) Yes Within-host competition (B: growth cost)…”
Section: Within-host Competition (A: Transmission Cost)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals currently in treatment maintain resistant strains (24,32,35,39) No: Only supports a small amount of coexistence (24)…”
Section: Treated Classmentioning
confidence: 99%