2011
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awr039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Harnessing neuroplasticity for clinical applications

Abstract: Neuroplasticity can be defined as the ability of the nervous system to respond to intrinsic or extrinsic stimuli by reorganizing its structure, function and connections. Major advances in the understanding of neuroplasticity have to date yielded few established interventions. To advance the translation of neuroplasticity research towards clinical applications, the National Institutes of Health Blueprint for Neuroscience Research sponsored a workshop in 2009. Basic and clinical researchers in disciplines from c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
733
0
13

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 973 publications
(754 citation statements)
references
References 223 publications
(253 reference statements)
8
733
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…It will be important to determine the longer-term impact of exercise as well as outcomes following longer and more frequent training periods. As is the case for many interventions focused on brain repair, 47 we acknowledge that our sample size was relatively small. We do note, however, that our sample size and/or participation rate are consistent with prior exercise trials in children.…”
Section: Neurooncologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It will be important to determine the longer-term impact of exercise as well as outcomes following longer and more frequent training periods. As is the case for many interventions focused on brain repair, 47 we acknowledge that our sample size was relatively small. We do note, however, that our sample size and/or participation rate are consistent with prior exercise trials in children.…”
Section: Neurooncologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test for hemispheric laterality, models were divided into a Left-sided (Models 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11) and a Right-sided Family (Models 2,8,12,13,14,15,16,17,18). To test for directionality of working memory information three Families where created for each experimental condition, Forward (Models 3,5,10,14,16,17), Backwards (Models 4,6,9,13,15,18) and Lateral (Models 1,2,7,8,11,12). All models were included in the BMS procedure, both when comparing individual models and model Families.…”
Section: Model Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We applied random effects BMS at the Family level to clarify the contribution of each hemisphere (Left: Models 1, 3,4,5,6,7,9,10,11;Right: Models 2,8,12,13,14,15,16,17,18) and to elucidate the direction of information (Forward, Backward or Lateral) at different memory loads. The Left-sided Family showed the highest exceedance probability (65%; Figure 3A) in the 1-back modulation.…”
Section: Family-wise Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…43) Spontaneous clinical improvement in stroke, trauma, and spinal cord injuries is associated with observable changes at both the cellular level and within the functional connectivity of the relevant neural networks. 44) Moreover, therapies designed to employ the brain's plasticity have been shown to mimic or exceed these changes. For example, studies of post-stroke therapies demonstrate both restoration of functional organization and creation of neuronal projections [45][46][47] while similar studies of brain or spinal cord injuries correlate clinical improvement with observable changes in functional and structural neuroimaging.…”
Section: Neuroplasticity As a Therapeutic Target In Schizophreniamentioning
confidence: 99%