2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.95.029602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Harris and Quong Reply:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

26
121
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
26
121
2
Order By: Relevance
“…41,68,69,100 The adsorption energy is calculated as (14) where E(hydrated slab) is the energy of the slab with one adsorbed water molecule, E(dry slab) is the energy of an isolated and relaxed slab, and E(H 2 O) is the energy of an isolated water molecule for the same system (all calculations are carried out with identical simulation parameters). The calculated adsorption energies (and net atomic charges, 23 reported in Table S1 of the supplementary material) were in good agreement with previously reported results 41,42,68,69,101,102 with the partial exception of anatase (100) and (001), where we found slightly larger ∆E ads compared to the work of Arrouvel et al 68 This difference can be attributed to the significantly lower energy cutoff used in that study compared to the present work. …”
Section: A Adsorption Of Single Water Molecules On Tiosupporting
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…41,68,69,100 The adsorption energy is calculated as (14) where E(hydrated slab) is the energy of the slab with one adsorbed water molecule, E(dry slab) is the energy of an isolated and relaxed slab, and E(H 2 O) is the energy of an isolated water molecule for the same system (all calculations are carried out with identical simulation parameters). The calculated adsorption energies (and net atomic charges, 23 reported in Table S1 of the supplementary material) were in good agreement with previously reported results 41,42,68,69,101,102 with the partial exception of anatase (100) and (001), where we found slightly larger ∆E ads compared to the work of Arrouvel et al 68 This difference can be attributed to the significantly lower energy cutoff used in that study compared to the present work. …”
Section: A Adsorption Of Single Water Molecules On Tiosupporting
confidence: 65%
“…47 With such a low free energy barrier, thermal fluctuations will lead to coexistence of molecular and dissociated waters at full hydration. 42,45,50,70,122 The subtle surface energetics renders theoretical calculations sensitive to modeling details such as TiO 2 slab thickness 43,46 and choice of the xc-functional. 46 A single water dissociation event on rutile (110) was detected during the 50 ps-simulation carried out in the present work.…”
Section: Diffusion In the Hydration Layersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conclusively, it has been made clear that the symmetry-breaking induced by the interactions between adsorbates benefits the system energetically. Although the symmetry effects discussed above are quite crucial, they have not been described in detail in previous studies 34,[42][43][44][45][46][47][48]66,100 . 78 are shown for relaxed geometries in two-molecule adsorption.…”
Section: Appendix B: Effect Of Symmetry Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Thus, ab-initio molecular dynamics investigations considering the water liquid phase in contact with titania have been carried out only in a limited number of occasions, to address the rutile (110) [58][59][60][61] and the anatase (101) and (001) surfaces [62]. Instead, there is a large number of DFT studies which have examined stoichiometric and defective titania interfaces in the presence of just a few water monolayers, typically ranging from one to three [63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71]. In this section we illustrate the applicability of our hybrid quantum- The DFT parameters concerning planewave basis, pseudopotentials, and exchange correlation functional, were the same as employed to describe the water bulk phase in the previous section.…”
Section: Anatasementioning
confidence: 99%