2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Harvest planning in the Brazilian sugar cane industry via mixed integer programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
42
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyzing the models related to sugarcane harvesting and transportation planning available in the literature, it was observed that although the studies carried out by Higgins (1999), Higgins & Muchow (2003), Higgins et al (2004), Grunow et al (2007), and Jena & Poggi (2013) address many aspects of the situation-problem using GAP -Generalized Atribution Problem, planting and harvesting are addressed without examining the harvest front shifts. The discussions are based on previous concepts of harvest fronts without considering harvest block scheduling, reduction in the production capacity due to the harvest front shifts, and the impact of these shifts on harvesting and transport capacity.…”
Section: Research Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analyzing the models related to sugarcane harvesting and transportation planning available in the literature, it was observed that although the studies carried out by Higgins (1999), Higgins & Muchow (2003), Higgins et al (2004), Grunow et al (2007), and Jena & Poggi (2013) address many aspects of the situation-problem using GAP -Generalized Atribution Problem, planting and harvesting are addressed without examining the harvest front shifts. The discussions are based on previous concepts of harvest fronts without considering harvest block scheduling, reduction in the production capacity due to the harvest front shifts, and the impact of these shifts on harvesting and transport capacity.…”
Section: Research Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some computational tools available in the market and in literature focus on the following planning and control models: sugarcane field reform planning (Barata, 1992;Higgins, 1999), crop planting planning (Sartori et al, 2001) harvesting planning (Barata, 1992;Grunow et al, 2007;Jena & Poggi, 2013) operational planning (Grunow et al, 2007;Jena & Poggi, 2013), and traffic control (Hahn & Ribeiro, 1999). However, there are few studies available in the literature addressing programming and scheduling of sugarcane harvest fronts (Junqueira, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed an improvement average of 16.38% in sugar production. Jena and Poggi [8] presented an optimization model for tactical and operational planning such that the total sugar content in the harvested sugarcane is maximized. The model was solved using heuristic techniques and approached Lagrangian relaxation or Benders decomposition.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies have addressed planning sugarcane harvesting, such as: Higgins et al (1998Higgins et al ( , 2004a, Higgins (1999Higgins ( , 2002 and Higgins & Muchow (2003) in the Australian context; Grunow et al (2007) in the Venezuelan context and Jena & Poggi (2013) in the Brazilian context. However, these studies either disregard the division into harvesting fronts or predefine it by harvest blocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to address the actual sugarcane harvesting planning, Higgins et al (2004b), Higgins & Laredo (2006), as well as Jena & Poggi (2013) proposed methods that aggregate harvest blocks in order to reduce the number of variables involved. In parallel, heuristic methods based on MIP, such as relax-and-fix, presented by Pochet & Wolsey (2006) and fix-and-optimize, proposed by Helber & Sahling (2010), have been widely used to solve the large scale General Lotsizing and Scheduling Problem for Parallel Production Lines, as shown for example in Beraldi et al (2008), Ferreira et al (2009Ferreira et al ( , 2012, Toso et al (2009) and Helber & Sahling (2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%