2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.03.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Harvest residue management and fertilisation effects on soil carbon and nitrogen in a 15-year-old Pinus radiata plantation forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
18
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some previous studies have indicated the importance of N on C dynamics in forest systems (Cusack et al, 2011;Jones et al, 2011) and tropical regions (Cusack et al, 2011;Huang et al, 2011), as well as on microorganism activities (Keeler et al, 2009;Janssens et al, 2010). If, on the one hand, N addition has been related to an increase in the formation of microbial products with longer soil residence time (Cotrufo et al, 2013), on the other hand, it has been related to higher SOM mineralization rates (Khan et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some previous studies have indicated the importance of N on C dynamics in forest systems (Cusack et al, 2011;Jones et al, 2011) and tropical regions (Cusack et al, 2011;Huang et al, 2011), as well as on microorganism activities (Keeler et al, 2009;Janssens et al, 2010). If, on the one hand, N addition has been related to an increase in the formation of microbial products with longer soil residence time (Cotrufo et al, 2013), on the other hand, it has been related to higher SOM mineralization rates (Khan et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same way, a system of allocative biomass equations was specified to allocate the estimated total residue biomass in Step 1 to the three subcomponents: res + ε 23 (13) where Y stump , Y branch and Y waste represent for stump, branch, and waste biomass in either fresh or dry weight in kg,Ŷ res represents the corresponding predicted total residue biomass in kg from any of the systems of additive equations, r 21 , r 22 , r 23 and r 24 are coefficients, ε 21 , ε 22 and ε 23 are the error terms.…”
Section: Allocative Biomass Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, estimates of harvest residue biomass enable the calculation of its energy content and other material properties during subsequent residue processing as an energy source [21]. More importantly, as demonstrated by Smith et al [22], Eisenbies et al [15] and Jones et al [23], these estimates provide the basis for the estimation of nutrient removals by collecting harvest residues for bioenergy and for the evaluation of the long-term implications of the removals on the nutrient budget, site productivity and the sustainability of plantations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biomass removal treatments applied at both sites were stem-only harvesting (SO), whole tree harvesting (WT) and whole tree harvesting plus forest floor removal (FF). Biomass and nutritional data were collected from Tarawera 16 years after planting, and 15 years after planting at Kinleith (Jones et al, 2008;Jones et al, 2011;Oliver et al, 2011). A fertilization treatment was also applied at both sites, although comprehensive data were only available regarding N pool sizes at the Kinleith site (Jones et al, 2011), which received 950 kg N ha −1 over the period between the ages of 1 and 6.…”
Section: Data Used To Assess Model Performancementioning
confidence: 99%