2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2022.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Harvesting anterior iliac crest or calvarial bone grafts to augment severely resorbed edentulous jaws: a systematic review and meta-analysis of patient-reported outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In conclusion, almost 80%–100% of patients reported that they would undergo the same treatment again if necessary 173 . A recent systematic review pointed out that long‐term implant survival in sites augmented with iliac crest bone is consistently lower than augmentations with intra‐oral grafts 72 .…”
Section: Autologous Donor Sites and Graft Principlesmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In conclusion, almost 80%–100% of patients reported that they would undergo the same treatment again if necessary 173 . A recent systematic review pointed out that long‐term implant survival in sites augmented with iliac crest bone is consistently lower than augmentations with intra‐oral grafts 72 .…”
Section: Autologous Donor Sites and Graft Principlesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…83 This may also result from the high resorption rates of the iliac crest bone, especially during the initial postoperative healing phase, indicating the need for early implant placement after 3 months of healing. 86,174 Even so, iliac crest bone is mainly used in advanced cases needing more bone and, therefore, with potentially higher complications (Figure 8).…”
Section: Extraoral Bone Blocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 26 ] To reconstruct the ideal bony contour after trauma, maxillofacial bone augmentation surgery can be carried out using bone substitutes. [ 27 ] The most commonly used bone defect regeneration scaffold materials are xenogenic bone substitutes such as Bio‐Oss. [ 28 ] However, due to their poor cohesiveness, continuous hemorrhaging during surgery and postoperative physiological activities often leads to leakage and displacement of the bone substitutes at the bone defect site and ultimately impacts the outcome of the surgery.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calvarial bone serves as a valuable alternative to iliac crest bone. Wortmann et al (2022) conducted a meta-analysis and compared patient-reported outcomes following autogenous iliac bone or calvarial bone harvesting in orally compromised patients [ 17 ]. They obtained patient-reported satisfaction with a median VAS score ranging from 8.8–10 in 206 patients following calvarial bone augmentation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%