Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia 2006
DOI: 10.1145/1149941.1149962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Harvesting social knowledge from folksonomies

Abstract: Collaborative tagging systems, or folksonomies, have the potential of becoming technological infrastructure to support knowledge management activities in an organization or a society. There are many challenges, however. This paper presents designs that enhance collaborative tagging systems to meet some key challenges: community identification, ontology generation, user and document recommendation. Design prototypes, evaluation methodology and selected preliminary results are presented.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
77
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other work focuses on personal recommendations based on the relatedness between the tags, as in [ 21]; in our approach, we currently use the same technique; however for future versions, we plan to apply other adaptive learning strategies as described by the LAG language. Furthermore, in [ 1] user groups are created based on the user tags; whereas in our method, we allow the end users to have full control on creating/joining/leaving the groups based on the user's privileges within the system.…”
Section: Evaluations and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other work focuses on personal recommendations based on the relatedness between the tags, as in [ 21]; in our approach, we currently use the same technique; however for future versions, we plan to apply other adaptive learning strategies as described by the LAG language. Furthermore, in [ 1] user groups are created based on the user tags; whereas in our method, we allow the end users to have full control on creating/joining/leaving the groups based on the user's privileges within the system.…”
Section: Evaluations and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Folksonomy is created by open and uncontrolled systems (social tagging systems) where users can annotate resources with different tags depending on their social or cultural backgrounds, expertise and perception of the world (Belelman et al, 2006;Golder and Huberman, 2005;Peterson, 2006;Wu H. et al, 2006).…”
Section: Folksonomy and Ontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a free-form annotation of web resources, done by users, and without the constraints of a predefined taxonomy or ontology (Wu H et al, 2006). Thus, in the Social Web, the meaning of the tagging data is completely unspecified.…”
Section: Folksonomy and Ontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However while tagging systems claim to have many advantages over controlled vocabularies or taxonomies, they still suffer from some limitations, such as the lack of lexical relations [6] or information overload [7]. Searching and retrieving may turn very limited if we ignore lexical relations, especially in a system where many users with different backgrounds have added different tags.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%