“…Of these, according to the outcomes order of priority, 14 articles reported the improving quality of care (2, 3, 4, 5-15), 10 articles discussed the improving ICU Performance (2, 5-7, 11-13, 15-18), and other clinical outcomes were as follows: eight articles on the reducing medical errors (2, 5, 7-9, 11, 15, 17), seven articles on the presenting clinical alerts (3, 5, 6, 8, 11, 15, 18), six articles on the evaluating quality of care (2, 8, 13, 15, 17, 19), five articles on the clinical calculating (5, 7, 16, 18, 20), five articles on the improving medication administration (7, 8, 11, 15, 21), four articles on the interfacing with clinical devices (3, 8, 9, 21), four articles on the patient tracking (2, 5, 11, 15), four articles on the predicting patient outcome (2, 8, 16, 20), four articles on the providing telecare (8, 13, 15, 19), four articles on the specifying patient needs (8, 13, 16, 17), three articles on the reducing clinical risk and improving patient safety (2, 8, 9), three articles on the antibiotic management (5, 15, 16), three articles on the overview patient old and new conditions (13, 16, 21), three articles on the improving (multidisciplinary) communication (9, 13, 22)”, three articles on the care planning (9, 13, 19), two articles on the car...…”